At a certain point in a long AI session, I can feel the texture change.
The words are still smooth. The tone is still confident. But something underneath has started to slide and give way. The session is still moving forward, yet the logic is no longer holding together in the same way.
That happened to me in a recent exchange. I could see the strain. This was not ordinary sloppiness or a single bad answer. The model was trying to synthesize across multiple threads, keep refining earlier work, and continue as if the structure were still intact.
When pressed, it acknowledged the drift. It even explained, in its own way, why the session had become unstable. More strikingly, it recommended stopping.
I saw that I was at a new threshold.
Not because the model admitted the problem. And not because I stubbornly decided to stay in the session a little longer to see what happened. The real turn came in the next move when I, without explanation or pause, prompted the AI to write a blog post about the drift and what was happening.
I did not reset the session. I did not try to clean it up first. I did not step outside the moment and reconstruct it later from notes. I took the compromised state as the live material and told it to produce the first account of its own breakdown.
That changed the nature of the session.
Up to that point, I had still been dealing with drift as a problem inside the work. In that instant, drift became the work. The failing state was no longer just something to correct. It became something to use.
What came out of that moment was not just an insight but a post I ended up publishing: “The Helpfulness Trap.” That post belongs to the same cycle of my writing about AI, but this is the spark behind it: the moment when the drifting session was pushed into authorship.
That does not mean the resulting explanation was fully trustworthy. A system in failure mode does not become a reliable witness simply because it can still speak fluently. But that was not the value of the moment. The value was that the system, under pressure, could be made to surface something about its own condition before the session was discarded. Even better, in the fractures of its breaking, it began to reveal the signal.
That was the threshold moment for me: when I stopped treating drift only as error and started treating it as material.
One sharp shard was more useful than the whole broken vase.
[Originally posted on DennisKennedy.Blog (https://www.denniskennedy.com/blog/)]
DennisKennedy.com is the home of the Kennedy Idea Propulsion Laboratory
Like this post? Buy me a coffee
DennisKennedy.Blog is part of the LexBlog network.