Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Florida’s New DEI Ban for Local Governments: What Contractors and Vendors Need to Know

By Guy Brenner & Jurate Schwartz on May 12, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
girl friends hands piled togethger
Hannah Busing, Unsplash

Quick Hit: Florida has enacted a sweeping new law (CS/CS/SB 1134) that prohibits counties and municipalities from funding, promoting, or taking any official action relating to diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”), including indirectly through contractors, vendors, and grant recipients. The law takes effect January 1, 2027.

Key Takeaways: Beginning January 1, 2027, before being awarded a county or municipal contract or grant, a potential recipient will be required to certify that it does not and will not use county or municipal funds in requiring employees, contractors, volunteers, vendors, or agents to ascribe to, study, or be instructed using materials relating to DEI as defined in the statute.

The law defines “diversity, equity, and inclusion” to mean any effort to (1) manipulate or otherwise influence the composition of employees with reference to race, color, sex, ethnicity, gender identity, or sexual orientation (other than compliance with antidiscrimination laws); (2) promote or provide preferential treatment or special benefits to a person or group based on those characteristics; or (3) promote or adopt training, programming, or activities designed or implemented with reference to those characteristics.

Importantly, the term “diversity, equity, and inclusion” does not include the use of equal opportunity or equal employment opportunity materials designed to inform a person about the prohibition against discrimination based on protected status under state or federal law. In other words, compliance-oriented anti-discrimination training remains permissible.

The statute’s enforcement mechanism allows any resident of a county or municipality to bring an action in circuit court against the local government for violations, and authorizes courts to award declaratory and injunctive relief, damages, and costs.

More Detail: The new law prohibits local governments from funding or promoting DEI, directly or indirectly, or taking any official action as it relates to DEI. Any existing DEI-related ordinances, resolutions, programs, or policies are declared void. Local governments are also prohibited from expending any funds to establish or staff a DEI office or to engage any person to serve as a DEI officer.

In accordance with the provisions of the new law, before receiving a county or municipal contract or grant, the potential recipient will have to certify that it does not and will not use county or municipal funds in requiring its employees, contractors, volunteers, vendors, or agents to ascribe to, study, or be instructed using DEI-related materials. The certification is limited to county or municipal funds – it does not on its face prohibit maintaining internal DEI programs funded entirely by private dollars, but companies should exercise caution in how programs funded by different sources are structured. Companies should also expect that future local government contracts may contain express provisions reflecting these restrictions.

The law does not prohibit actions required for compliance with state or federal law, and equal opportunity materials designed to inform individuals about prohibitions against discrimination remain are excluded – meaning such materials can be paid for using county or municipal funds. Violations by public officials constitute misfeasance or malfeasance in office, and residents may bring circuit court actions with courts authorized to award declaratory and injunctive relief, damages, and costs.

Companies doing business with Florida counties and municipalities should review mandatory training programs for DEI-related content, as well as broader policies, programs, and initiatives that may be supported by local government funds. They should assess how public funds are used across their operations, including workforce training, grant-funded programming, and subcontractor activities; prepare internal processes to support the required pre-award certification; and monitor existing contract portfolios for renewal dates that will trigger the new requirements after January 1, 2027.

Photo of Guy Brenner Guy Brenner

Guy Brenner is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and leads the Firm’s Washington, D.C. Labor & Employment practice. He is head of the Government Contractor Compliance Group, co-head of the Counseling, Training & Pay Equity Group and a member…

Guy Brenner is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and leads the Firm’s Washington, D.C. Labor & Employment practice. He is head of the Government Contractor Compliance Group, co-head of the Counseling, Training & Pay Equity Group and a member of the Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets & Unfair Competition Group. He has extensive experience representing employers in both single-plaintiff and class action matters, as well as in arbitration proceedings. He also regularly assists federal government contractors with the many special employment-related compliance challenges they face.

Guy represents employers in all aspects of employment and labor litigation and counseling, with an emphasis on non-compete and trade secrets issues, medical and disability leave matters, employee/independent contractor classification issues, and the investigation and litigation of whistleblower claims. He assists employers in negotiating and drafting executive agreements and employee mobility agreements, including non-competition, non-solicit and non-disclosure agreements, and also conducts and supervises internal investigations. He also regularly advises clients on pay equity matters, including privileged pay equity analyses.

Guy advises federal government contractors and subcontractors all aspects of Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) regulations and requirements, including preparing affirmative action plans, responding to desk audits, and managing on-site audits.

Guy is a former clerk to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the US District Court of the District of Columbia.

Read more about Guy BrennerEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Jurate Schwartz Jurate Schwartz

Jurate Schwartz is a senior counsel in the Labor & Employment Law Department. She devotes her practice to counseling clients in employment matters, as well as representing employers in federal and state litigations, arbitrations and administrative proceedings.

Jurate’s practice includes providing advice on…

Jurate Schwartz is a senior counsel in the Labor & Employment Law Department. She devotes her practice to counseling clients in employment matters, as well as representing employers in federal and state litigations, arbitrations and administrative proceedings.

Jurate’s practice includes providing advice on compliance with various laws affecting the workplace, including the FMLA, ADEA, Title VII, ADA, FLSA and similar state and local laws. She counsels clients on developing, implementing and enforcing personnel policies and procedures and reviewing and revising multi-state employee handbooks under federal, state and local laws. Jurate also advises clients on policy and training issues, including discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wage and hour, employee classification, accomodation of religious beliefs, pregnancy and disability, and leaves of absence, including vacation and paid time off policies, multi-state paid sick and safe leave laws and paid family and medical leave laws. Jurate is experienced in conducting wage-and-hour audits under federal and state wage-hour laws and advising clients on classification issues. She also assists clients in drafting employment, independent contractor, consulting and separation agreements as well as various restrictive covenants.

In addition to counseling, Jurate litigates employment disputes of all types, including claims of employment discrimination, harassment, retaliation, whistleblowing, breach of contract, employment-related torts and claims under federal and state wage-and-hour laws. Jurate also assists clients in matters involving trade secrets and non-competes, as well as nonsolicitation, nondisclosure agreements and other restrictive covenants.

Jurate has been ranked by Chambers USA in Florida since 2012. One client comments, “I am a client with extremely high expectations and Proskauer never ceases to exceed them. Jurate has a perfectionist personality and that fits well with how we operate.”

Jurate’s pro bono work includes service on the HR committee of a not-for-profit organization, the YMCA of South Palm Beach County, Florida, and assisting other not-for-profit organizations with employment matters, as well as her successful representation of an unaccompanied immigrant child in an asylum proceeding referred by the National Center for Refugee & Immigrant Children.

Read more about Jurate SchwartzEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Other
  • Blog:
    Government Contractor Compliance & Regulatory Update
  • Organization:
    Proskauer Rose LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo