Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Executive Order on Strengthening Customs Enforcement

By Valerie Ellis, John Brew & Brett Everett on June 4, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On June 3, 2026, the White House issued an Executive Order (“Strengthening Customs Enforcement”) that directs the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) to take a series of actions intended to combat customs fraud, transshipment, forced labor imports, duty evasion, and other trade-related violations. While many of the directives will require future rulemaking or policy changes before becoming effective, the Order signals a significant increase in customs enforcement and scrutiny of foreign importers.

Key directives include:

1. Increased scrutiny of foreign importers of record

The Order identifies foreign importers of record as an enforcement concern and directs CBP to develop enhanced requirements for foreign entities importing goods into the United States. These requirements may include:

  • Increased bond requirements;
  • Additional disclosures regarding ownership and business operations;
  • Disclosure of affiliations and beneficial ownership;
  • Information regarding anticipated import volumes and U.S. assets.

2. Restrictions on informal entry procedures

The Order directs CBP to revise regulations so that foreign importers of record are no longer eligible to use informal entry procedures and instead must utilize formal entry processes.

3. Creation of an importer “good standing” requirement

CBP is directed to establish standards under which importers must remain in good standing to continue importing merchandise into the United States. Importers that fail to meet those standards could face restrictions on import activity.

4. Enhanced enforcement against customs fraud

The Order emphasizes enforcement against:

  • Transshipment schemes;
  • Country-of-origin evasion;
  • Undervaluation;
  • Misclassification;
  • Forced labor imports;
  • Other customs violations.

5. More stringent penalty policies

CBP is directed to revise penalty mitigation practices and establish a minimum mitigation threshold under which importers generally would remain responsible for at least 50 percent of assessed penalties absent exceptional circumstances.

6. Additional legislative proposals

DHS must submit recommendations to the President within 45 days regarding further legislative changes that could strengthen customs enforcement authorities.

Practical Implications

The Executive Order does not itself impose immediate new compliance obligations on importers. Instead, it directs DHS and CBP to develop regulations, procedures, and policies implementing the Administration’s enforcement objectives. However, the Order clearly signals increased scrutiny of foreign importers of record and suggests that companies importing into the United States through non-U.S. entities should closely monitor forthcoming regulatory developments.

Photo of Valerie Ellis Valerie Ellis

Valerie Ellis is an accomplished attorney with extensive experience in international trade law, spanning both the public and private sectors.

Valerie focuses on trade remedy proceedings, with a strong track record of guiding companies through the examination process in antidumping and countervailing duty

…

Valerie Ellis is an accomplished attorney with extensive experience in international trade law, spanning both the public and private sectors.

Valerie focuses on trade remedy proceedings, with a strong track record of guiding companies through the examination process in antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) investigations. She also represents companies in customs and tariffs matters and in national security investigations, including guiding deals through the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). She has represented clients across diverse industries, including agriculture and manufacturing, with a particular focus on U.S.-Canada-Mexico trade issues, including complex tariff matters. Known for her creative problem-solving, tireless advocacy, and technical proficiency, Valerie is a trusted advisor who brings both skill and a collaborative approach to every matter she handles.

Valerie has worked in the private sector and held positions at various times at the Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration throughout her career.

When not representing clients in trade matters, Valerie performs service work for women experiencing the cycle of abuse, those suffering from addiction, and the homeless.

Read more about Valerie EllisEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of John Brew John Brew

John Brew is the former chair of Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group and a partner in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

John has extensive experience in import and export trade regulation, collaborating with corporations, trade associations, foreign governments, and nongovernmental organizations on…

John Brew is the former chair of Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group and a partner in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

John has extensive experience in import and export trade regulation, collaborating with corporations, trade associations, foreign governments, and nongovernmental organizations on customs administration, enforcement, compliance litigation, legislation, and policy matters. He represents clients in proceedings at the administrative and judicial levels as well as before Congress and the international bureaucracies that handle customs and trade matters. John advises clients on all substantive import regulatory issues handled by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, such as classification, valuation, origin, marking, tariff preference programs, other agency regulations, admissibility, customs brokerage, Section 321, drawback, foreign trade zones, duty recovery programs, import restrictions, quotas, audits, prior disclosures, penalties, investigations, Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism and trade compliance programs, importations under bond, the Jones Act, and vessel repairs.

Read more about John BrewEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Brett Everett Brett Everett

Brett Everett is a senior international trade specialist II in Crowell & Moring’s Los Angeles office. He has over ten years of experience as a Licensed Customs Broker with a primary focus on trade with Asia. He has experience with client inquiries into

…

Brett Everett is a senior international trade specialist II in Crowell & Moring’s Los Angeles office. He has over ten years of experience as a Licensed Customs Broker with a primary focus on trade with Asia. He has experience with client inquiries into the classification of merchandise under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, antidumping/countervailing orders and circumvention, Section 232, and Section 301 matters. Brett has developed compliance and audit programs and has experience with Post Entry Correction filings, protests, and other filings with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

He supports clients with import regulatory matters pending primarily before CBP in all areas of import regulatory compliance, customs valuation, country of origin and marking, trade preference programs and free trade agreements, and CBP inquiries (i.e., CF-28s and CF-29s).

Read more about Brett EverettEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial, Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    International Trade Law
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo