Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Red Carded: 40-Year-Old EEOC Affirmative Action Guidance Removed from the Game

By Diana Evans & Jennifer M. Trulock on July 9, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Red Carded: 40-Year-Old EEOC Affirmative Action Guidance Removed from the Game

On June 29, 2026, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) voted to rescind two policy documents laying out steps employers can take to increase representation of historically marginalized groups in the workplace (i.e., affirmative action). The two documents are the EEOC’s “Affirmative Action Appropriate Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as Amended” (Affirmative Action Guidelines) and its “Compliance Manual Section 607 on Affirmative Action” (Compliance Manual). A week later, the recission became official when the EEOC published its final interpretive rule. According to EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas, the change was intended to ensure EEOC guidance was consistent with Title VII and the principle of equal treatment under the law.

The Affirmative Action Guidelines were originally adopted in 1979 to encourage and protect voluntary affirmative action by entities covered by Title VII, including private employers, who took steps to expand opportunities for minorities and women. The Affirmative Action Guidelines and related Compliance Manual were intended to lay out the type of affirmative action that was legally appropriate and that would not be considered unfair treatment to majority groups (i.e., reverse discrimination). The documents also provided some legal protection under Title VII’s safe-harbor provision for employers who adopted a written affirmative action policy with good-faith reliance on the Affirmative Action Guidelines and Compliance Manual to raise that reliance as a defense in a Title VII action.  

So how does this move change the playing field for private employers? The law, including Title VII, remains the same. However, employers who implement voluntary affirmative action policies can no longer rely on the Affirmative Action Guidelines and Compliance Manual as appropriate guidance or as a potential defense against reverse discrimination claims. It also further highlights the EEOC’s increased scrutiny of workplace diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies and practices. While the recission of this guidance does not prohibit all DEI or anti-discrimination efforts, employers should be mindful that any such efforts do not result in unequal treatment based on protected characteristics. Employers should use this new development as a reminder to review any policies implemented under the Affirmative Action Guidelines and Compliance Manual and to keep abreast of the ever-changing legal landscape in this area. As the legal landscape continues to maneuver through these changes, employers should regularly audit their policies and practices to ensure compliance with federal, state, and local laws.

For other recent developments related to DEI initiatives, more information can be found in the following updates:

  • What to Know About the War Being Waged Against DEI | Labor & Employment Insights
  • The Future of DEI Programs for Private Employers: DEI-D in the Water? | Labor & Employment Insights
  • “Supreme Court Shakes Things Up: Reversal of the ‘Background Circumstances’ Rule Marks Major Legal Shift” | Labor & Employment Insights
  • Flipping the Script: The EEOC’s Lawsuit Against the New York Times Takes Aim at “Reverse” Discrimination | Labor & Employment Insights

Photo of Diana Evans Diana Evans

Diana Evans joined the firm as a member of the Litigation Practice Group after clerking for the Hon. James S. Moody Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Her practice focuses on commercial litigation in both state and…

Diana Evans joined the firm as a member of the Litigation Practice Group after clerking for the Hon. James S. Moody Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Her practice focuses on commercial litigation in both state and federal court in areas including product liability and employment law.

Read more about Diana EvansEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Jennifer M. Trulock Jennifer M. Trulock

Jennifer Trulock advises companies on managing workplace legal issues, conducting investigations into employee misconduct, and preventing employment lawsuits. She also is experienced in handling acquisition/divestiture employment issues, including due diligence, pre-merger planning and post-merger integration issues. Jennifer counsels employers on developing and applying…

Jennifer Trulock advises companies on managing workplace legal issues, conducting investigations into employee misconduct, and preventing employment lawsuits. She also is experienced in handling acquisition/divestiture employment issues, including due diligence, pre-merger planning and post-merger integration issues. Jennifer counsels employers on developing and applying personnel policies and in responding to and resolving complaints before reaching litigation. She also assists clients in negotiating employment agreements, as well as separation agreements.

Read more about Jennifer M. TrulockEmailJennifer's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Labor & Employment Insights
  • Organization:
    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo