Vice Chancellor Laster begins his May 26, 2026 opinion in the Zync, Inc. v. Porsche Investments Management, S.A. case with a Cold War era tale of a malfunctioning safety switch that prevented a hydrogen bomb from exploding over Goldsboro, North Carolina. He invokes this story to show the great importance some omissions can have. The opinion then goes on, however, to find that not all omissions are quite so meaningful and some omissions are insufficient to establish personal jurisdiction.
The post <em>Zync v. Porsche</em>: Omissions in Hydrogen Bombs and Corporate Filings appeared first on Enhanced Scrutiny.