Corporate titles have proliferated. Delaware’s officer-consent statute has not. In Altigen Communications, Inc. v. Day, C.A. No. 2025-1298-JTL (Del. Ch. Aug. 21, 2026), Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster held that the Delaware Court of Chancery lacked personal jurisdiction over
Sidley Austin Blog
The Sidley Austin Blog, published by Sidley Austin LLP, focuses on developments in mergers and acquisitions (M&A), corporate governance, and related litigation. It covers topics such as securities litigation, corporate charter and bylaw provisions, shareholder rights, whistleblower complaints, board responsibilities, jurisdictional issues in corporate disputes, and fiduciary duties of directors. The blog analyzes recent court decisions, regulatory enforcement actions, and best practices for corporate governance and compliance. It provides insights into Delaware Court of Chancery rulings and other significant cases affecting corporate law and shareholder litigation.
Blog Authors
Latest from Sidley Austin Blog
Still Experts After Stillfront: Two Chancery Decisions Confine Independent Accountants to Accounting Disputes
M&A agreements routinely send disputes over earnouts and purchase-price adjustments to an independent accountant, and, as this blog has discussed before, the parties then fight over how much the accountant can decide. Earlier this year, in Fortis Advisors, LLC v.…
How to Win and Still Lose: Delaware Court of Chancery’s Expanding Focus From Individual AI Misuse to Organizational Governance
A July 1, 2026 order from the Delaware Court of Chancery provides another insight into the risks of using generative artificial intelligence (“GenAI”) without adequate human review, and highlights the court’s increased focus on organizational controls governing AI use. Although…
When the Meeting Minutes and the AI Transcript Don’t Match: Litigation Insights from Delaware Chancery
You join a virtual meeting and a banner appears: The meeting is being transcribed by AI. You scan the attendees, glance at the agenda, and run a quick risk-benefit analysis. Who turned it on? Should I say something? Will someone…
Hiding the Ball Has Consequences: Delaware Supreme Court Reverses on Justifiable Reliance in M&A Fraud Claim
By Jim Ducayet & Deborah Sands
In Paragon Metals Holdings LLC v. Smith, No. 385, 2025 (Del. July 1, 2026), the Delaware Supreme Court held that a buyer could justifiably rely on representations in an acquisition agreement even though its due diligence failed to uncover…
Heightened Means Heightened: Chancery’s First Read of SB 21’s New Presumption Shuts Down Demand Futility
In Ayers v. Foley (available here), the Delaware Court of Chancery recently became the first court to interpret Section 144(d)(2) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL), the provision added by Senate Bill 21 (SB 21) in 2025…
Mind the Gap: Delaware Court of Chancery’s Clarification of the Implied Covenant’s Contractual Gap-Filling Role
Although the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing applies to nearly every contract governed under Delaware law, many claims alleging its breach fail at the earliest stages of litigation. Even when an implied covenant claim survives such preliminary…
Concessions and Particularity: How a Derivative Challenge to a Discounted Insider Financing Failed at the Pleading Stage
In the recent decision Marstrand Partners, L.P. v. Israel Biotech Fund I, L.P., C.A. No. 2024-0421-KSJM (Del. Ch. May 27, 2026), Chancellor McCormick dismissed a derivative challenge to a steeply discounted insider financing after holding that the plaintiff failed to plead demand…
Zync v. Porsche: Omissions in Hydrogen Bombs and Corporate Filings
By Jon Muenz & Matthew Henry
Vice Chancellor Laster begins his May 26, 2026 opinion in the Zync, Inc. v. Porsche Investments Management, S.A. case with a Cold War era tale of a malfunctioning safety switch that prevented a hydrogen bomb from exploding over Goldsboro, North…
Timing Is Everything: Section 220 Standing After a Merger Closes
On April 24, 2026, the Delaware Court of Chancery adopted a recommendation by the Magistrate in Chancery to dismiss an action to enforce a demand to inspect books and records under Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) Section 220 where the…