Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Appellate Decision Finds Standard Definition of Occurrence to Be Ambiguous, Allowing Policyholder to Choose Most Advantageous Interpretation in Determining Number of Occurrences

By Kirsten Jackson, Robert J. Gilbert & Jimmy Tabb on August 10, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit’s just-issued decision Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, et al., has established an important new tool for general liability insurance policyholders facing vexing problems involving liability for patterns of multiple harm arising from the same general circumstances or conditions, like sex abuse cases. The court determined that the standard CGL “occurrence” definition is ambiguous and must therefore be interpreted in whichever manner maximizes coverage for the policyholder.

Continue Reading ›

  • Posted in:
    Insurance
  • Blog:
    Policyholder Pulse
  • Organization:
    Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo