Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Department of War Launches Research Security Audits: Key Compliance Steps for Higher Education Institutions

By Chelsea Smith Press, Alex J. Brackett, Patrick Rowan & Sarah Wake on August 18, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Glasses notebook and laptop
Dan Dimmock, Unsplash

Background

On August 17, 2026, the Department of War issued formal notifications to 30 domestic academic institutions directing them to initiate immediate and comprehensive reviews of their academic, financial, and research collaborations with foreign entities of concern.  The notifications were executed by the Office of the Under Secretary of War for Research and Engineering and announced in a press release from the Department.

The action targets active institutional ties and collaborations with foreign entities identified under Section 1286 of the FY19 National Defense Authorization Act, as well as organizations associated with rebranded Confucius Institutes.  Confucius Institutes, funded by the Chinese government, were established on campuses nationwide ostensibly as cultural exchange programs. The Department’s focus on “rebranded” institutes suggests concern that some programs may have continued operating under different names.

The Department’s list of problematic entities reportedly includes 130 organizations from China, Russia, and Iran, ranging from electronic measurement laboratories to scientific research centers.

Compliance Requirements

To maintain eligibility for future federal research funding, notified universities must take the following steps by August 31, 2026: (i) complete a comprehensive audit of all identified foreign collaborations; (ii) assess exposure of sensitive or export-controlled research to foreign entities; (iii) implement strict mitigation plans, including the termination of problematic partnerships; and (iv) report findings and actions directly to the Department.

Congressional Coordination

The Department is pursuing this effort alongside partners in Congress, including the House and Senate Armed Services Committees, the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, and the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party.   This coordination signals a bipartisan, multi-branch commitment to protecting federally funded research from foreign exploitation.

Next Steps

Institutions should act now to assess and address their exposure. First, all recipients of federal funding (including those not notified by the Department) should review their foreign collaboration portfolios—particularly ties to entities in China, Russia, and Iran—against the Section 1286 list and known Confucius Institute affiliates. Institutions should also evaluate the status and effectiveness of their export control compliance protocols.  To the extent potentially problematic partnerships, as described in the notice, or export control gaps are identified, institutions should consider whether and what mitigation they can and are willing to implement.

Further, institutions should engage internal stakeholders and counsel early, as responding to the Department’s mandate, or preparing for potential future inquiries, will require close coordination among senior leadership, governing boards, general counsel, research offices, and compliance personnel. Given the extremely compressed August 31, 2026 deadline, this process should begin promptly for noticed institutions.

McGuireWoods will continue to closely monitor expanded actions, as the Department has indicated that these audits will help it identify emerging risks and respond to changing threat patterns, suggesting that this initiative may grow in scope or be followed by additional requirements. McGuireWoods has prepared a team internally that can assist targeted colleges and universities, if and as needed.  Whether you have received one of the notices, it is important for all research institutions—particularly R1 institutions—to understand that this security audit has occurred and could expand into a larger regulatory matter.

For questions or assistance on evaluating your response to the Department’s letter, contact the authors or a member of McGuireWoods’ Higher Education Enforcement & Regulatory Counseling Practice Group.

Photo of Chelsea Smith Press Chelsea Smith Press

Chelsea advises broker-dealers, investment advisors, banks, and proprietary trading firms on securities regulatory, compliance, and enforcement matters. Her expertise includes regulatory reporting, best execution, anti-money laundering, core compliance, and market access rules.

Read more about Chelsea Smith PressEmail
Photo of Alex J. Brackett Alex J. Brackett

Alex is a member of the Government Investigations and White Collar Litigation department, and co-head of McGuireWoods’ Strategic Risk and Compliance team. His practice focuses primarily on advising and supporting corporate and individual clients in the areas of white collar criminal defense and…

Alex is a member of the Government Investigations and White Collar Litigation department, and co-head of McGuireWoods’ Strategic Risk and Compliance team. His practice focuses primarily on advising and supporting corporate and individual clients in the areas of white collar criminal defense and internal investigations.

Read more about Alex J. BrackettEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Patrick Rowan Patrick Rowan

As a member of the firm’s nationally recognized Government Investigations and White Collar Litigation department, Pat’s practice focuses on criminal and civil enforcement proceedings and internal investigations. He has substantial experience in international and national security matters. He has represented individuals and companies…

As a member of the firm’s nationally recognized Government Investigations and White Collar Litigation department, Pat’s practice focuses on criminal and civil enforcement proceedings and internal investigations. He has substantial experience in international and national security matters. He has represented individuals and companies in a variety of federal criminal investigations, as well as civil enforcement actions. He also advises corporate clients on compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, OFAC sanctions, the ITAR, the EAR and CFIUS regulations. He has conducted numerous internal investigations for large companies with significant international operations.

Read more about Patrick RowanEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Sarah Wake Sarah Wake

Sarah, co-leader of the firm’s Higher Education Practice Group and Sports Industry Team, knows firsthand the complex legal and compliance challenges that corporations and educational institutions face, having served almost a decade as in-house counsel and a senior leader at top universities.

A…

Sarah, co-leader of the firm’s Higher Education Practice Group and Sports Industry Team, knows firsthand the complex legal and compliance challenges that corporations and educational institutions face, having served almost a decade as in-house counsel and a senior leader at top universities.

A skilled litigator, Sarah represents a wide range of higher education clients — including top research institutions, liberal arts colleges and institutions with Division I athletics programs  — on issues related to faculty tenure and promotion; student and employee unionization; discrimination and harassment policy, investigations and hearings; Title IX compliance; athletics (including coaching contracts, hazing, NCAA compliance and NIL); admissions; student conduct; diversity and inclusion; the Clery Act; the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act; and physical and digital accessibility.

Read more about Sarah WakeEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory, Corporate Governance and Compliance, Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    Subject to Inquiry
  • Organization:
    McGuireWoods LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo