Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Pet Products in the Global Arena: What International Regulators Are Watching

By Rachel Lee, Shane Yodlowski, Meghan McMeel & Eric Montens on September 4, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

A Market Without Borders – But With Many Regulators

The U.S. pet industry is booming — an estimated $158 billion market in 2024 — and that growth is equally pronounced overseas. Yet unlike well-established frameworks governing human consumer products, pet products occupy a fragmented international regulatory landscape. For companies that manufacture or sell pet products internationally, understanding that landscape is more important than ever.

The EU: The Most Consequential Development

For companies with products on European shelves, the EU represents the most significant international regulatory development in the pet products space thus far.

Non-food pet accessories like toys, carriers, beds, bowls, leashes, and grooming tools are primarily governed by the General Product Safety Regulation (EU) 2023/988 (“GPSR”), fully applicable since December 13, 2024. The GPSR requires that products are mechanically and chemically safe for normal use and foreseeable misuse, backed by product testing. It also imposes traceability obligations, corrective action duties, and — notably for e-commerce sellers — obligations on online marketplaces themselves.

Chemical safety operates alongside the GPSR through REACH (EC) 1907/2006, which restricts hazardous substances in materials commonly used in pet products, including plastics, textiles, rubber, and metals. Depending on the specificities of the pet product (e.g. electronic components, batteries, wooden components, repellents for pest control, etc.), other directives and regulations may, in addition, apply for certain aspects of the products, such as the Low Voltage Directive, the EMC Directive, the RoHS and WEEE directives, the Batteries Regulation, the EU Deforestation Regulation, and the Biocidal Regulation, etc.

International Standards: A Rising Floor

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) established the ISO/TC 355 (Pet Products) committee in 2025 to develop international safety requirements and test methods for pet products. While not legally binding, ISO standards have historically influenced regulatory floors. And as ASTM has noted, the absence of international safety standards for a market segment worth nearly $3 billion (pet toys alone) is a risk for all stakeholders.

In the absence of voluntary standards for pet products today, children’s products’ voluntary standards provide a strong stand-in – indeed one that regulators may even expect pet products to conform.

Pet Food Safety

Pet food falls under a separate EU regime anchored by Regulation (EC) 767/2009 (feed labeling and composition). Meanwhile pet supplements and wellness products that make disease-treatment or prevention claims risk classification as veterinary medicinal products under Regulation (EU) 2019/6, triggering full marketing authorization requirements, a significantly more burdensome pathway. Companies in the pet wellness space must map their claims carefully before entering European markets.

The EU’s regulatory evolution does not exist in isolation. In Japan, pet food safety is governed by the Act on Ensuring the Safety of Pet Food, which imposes substance standards and labeling requirements. In Australia, a dedicated statutory regime was considered but agriculture ministers concluded in April 2026 that a new regulatory approach was not warranted at this time — though the voluntary standard AS 5812 remains a key commercial benchmark.

How Pet Companies Selling Internationally Can Stay Ahead

In this evolving environment, relying on the absence of clear regulation is not a viable long-term risk management strategy. Companies should take concrete steps now:

  • Map product classifications market by market. The same product may be classified as food, a drug, a pesticide, or a general consumer product or may be subject to a variety of rules depending on the jurisdiction, the claims made, and its composition.
  • Invest in EU GPSR compliance. Consider aligning with voluntary and mandatory standards, especially those modeled after children’s safety standards, as a benchmark for pet product safety. The GPSR is already in effect and enforcement is active.
  • Review product claims before entering new markets. A claim permissible in the U.S. may trigger a veterinary medicinal product classification in the EU. Benchmark your risk assessment against standards for analogous consumer products — failing to do so increases company risk and exposure.
  • Engage retail partners. Maintain an open dialogue with retailers to understand their emerging expectations — major international retailers may impose requirements that go beyond what the law technically demands.
  • Monitor field data. Establish systems for tracking incident reports and product performance, both to identify risks early and to demonstrate a proactive safety posture.

The Bottom Line

The convergence of public concern, evolving industry practices, and emerging regulatory efforts — both at home and abroad — means that pet product companies need to be proactive. Companies that invest in understanding and meeting international requirements now will be better positioned for continued competitiveness and credibility as standards in the global pet industry continue to develop.

Photo of Meghan McMeel Meghan McMeel

Meghan McMeel provides strategic guidance to help businesses navigate complex regulatory landscapes, with a focus on product safety and compliance. Meghan has represented a wide range of clients in civil litigation in state and federal courts nationwide, including serving as national counsel.

Meghan’s

…

Meghan McMeel provides strategic guidance to help businesses navigate complex regulatory landscapes, with a focus on product safety and compliance. Meghan has represented a wide range of clients in civil litigation in state and federal courts nationwide, including serving as national counsel.

Meghan’s experience includes serving as senior corporate counsel at AmazonLab126, where she supported multiple global business lines.  She advised on compliance strategies related to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, Federal Drug Administration, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and international counterparts. Meghan further advised on hardware compliance, quality, and manufacturing risks for national and international expansion initiatives. Meghan was an adjunct professor at the University of California College of Law (formerly UC Hastings) where she taught Pre-trial Civil Litigation. Meghan also brings a wealth of experience from her tenure as partner at a law firm, where she specialized in civil litigation, guiding clients through litigation oversight, mediation, settlements, and regulatory matters. In addition to her civil litigation experience Meghan led white collar cases including compliance investigations including negotiating with federal and international justice departments.

Read more about Meghan McMeelEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Eric Montens Eric Montens

Eric Montens focuses his practice mainly on general commercial and corporate, competition, and product risk management matters.

Eric assists national and international clients on a variety of issues concerning commercial distribution and related matters, such as franchising, selective distribution, agency, competition, licensing, and…

Eric Montens focuses his practice mainly on general commercial and corporate, competition, and product risk management matters.

Eric assists national and international clients on a variety of issues concerning commercial distribution and related matters, such as franchising, selective distribution, agency, competition, licensing, and consumer protection. He regularly litigates distribution matters before national courts and arbitration panels.

As part of Eric’s product risk management practice, he advises corporations on the legislation applicable to their products when put on the EU market. He has represented manufacturers, suppliers, and importers in product safety (including product recall) matters with the national consumer safety authorities of the EU member states involving, among other things, tires, toys, children’s products, and other consumer goods. On international product risk management issues, Eric often works closely with Crowell & Moring’s U.S. offices as well as with lawyers in other parts of the world.

Eric has also been seconded to companies in the information technology/telecommunications sectors, where he has worked with clients both as part of their legal team and as stand-alone legal counsel in their day-to-day business, including software license review, general commercial contract review, distribution network development, litigation monitoring, and corporate matters.

Eric is a senior counsel in the firm’s Brussels office. He was admitted to the Brussels Bar in 2001. Before joining Crowell, he was an associate at a leading franchise and distribution law firm in Brussels.

Read more about Eric MontensEmailEric's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory, Business and Commercial, Corporate Governance and Compliance
  • Blog:
    Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo