Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Undetected HR Identity Fraud Compromises Company Networks

By Linn Foster Freedman on September 17, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Our clients are increasingly experiencing HR identity fraud—when an imposter (sometimes from a foreign adversary nation like North Korea) poses as a candidate for a remote job, often in the information technology space, in order to obtain access to company information or divert funds for a nefarious purpose.

The website Hypr recently issued its “first annual report analyzing hiring and employee fraud in 2026.” The 2026 State of HR Identity Fraud Report outlines the increase of hiring fraud and identifies that a shocking 98% of the 500 U.S. HR executives surveyed “have experienced candidate fraud firsthand.” The report examines how HR identity fraud is detected, how long it takes to identify it, and how to mitigate the risk through established processes.

While 90% of HR leaders have heightened concern over hiring fraud in the last two years, surprisingly, 68% of hiring fraud is discovered by a basic gut instinct—that is, when someone in the process felt something was “off,” as opposed to having established security controls in place.

The survey showed that 42% of cases are not caught pre-hire, and that “less than 3% are flagged the same day.” In addition, only a third are detected between one and three days, “45% require four to six days, and 20% go undetected for up to three weeks, averaging 5.73 days of unmonitored access.” This means that “by the time a red flag is raised, the fraudulent hire has already been provisioned with corporate credentials and internal network access.”

Part of the issue in failing to detect fraud is that there is no single point of supervision, as companies have outsourced a significant amount of work to vendors. “It’s a set of disconnected checks operating in silos. Because no single stage reliably stops candidate fraud, clearing an earlier stage offers no guarantee of identity assurance.” The internal team has specific obligations in the hiring process, and other functions are outsourced. This fragmentation allows threat actors to “infiltrate the onboarding process while accountability is transitioning between teams.”

The survey found that “42% of hiring fraud is detected only after employment begins. Among those post-hire cases, discovery takes an average of four to six days—by which point 98% of fraudulent hires have already been issued company credentials.” This means that the imposter had access to company data for a significant amount of time, which could include proprietary data, sensitive personal information, customer information or employee information. This unauthorized access requires an internal investigation and could lead to required notifications to individuals or customers.

The survey says that “24% of organizations spend one to three months resolving a single fake hire; while the rest lose one to three weeks. Almost no one clears an incident in under a week.”

The conclusion is “Most organizations already possess the core capabilities to solve this challenge. What remains missing is a unified, continuous owner for identity across the moments where HR, IT and Security currently hand it off to one another.” Reorganizing the hiring process to establish a single point of truth and responsibility for HR identity so threat actors can’t insert themselves into the hand-off process is worth serious consideration.

Photo of Linn Foster Freedman Linn Foster Freedman

Linn Freedman practices in data privacy and security law, cybersecurity, and complex litigation. She is a member of the Business Litigation Group and the Financial Services Cyber-Compliance Team, and chairs the firm’s Data Privacy and Security and Artificial Intelligence Teams. Linn focuses her…

Linn Freedman practices in data privacy and security law, cybersecurity, and complex litigation. She is a member of the Business Litigation Group and the Financial Services Cyber-Compliance Team, and chairs the firm’s Data Privacy and Security and Artificial Intelligence Teams. Linn focuses her practice on compliance with all state and federal privacy and security laws and regulations. She counsels a range of public and private clients from industries such as construction, education, health care, insurance, manufacturing, real estate, utilities and critical infrastructure, marine and charitable organizations, on state and federal data privacy and security investigations, as well as emergency data breach response and mitigation. Linn is an Adjunct Professor of the Practice of Cybersecurity at Brown University and an Adjunct Professor of Law at Roger Williams University School of Law.  Prior to joining the firm, Linn served as assistant attorney general and deputy chief of the Civil Division of the Attorney General’s Office for the State of Rhode Island. She earned her J.D. from Loyola University School of Law and her B.A., with honors, in American Studies from Newcomb College of Tulane University. She is admitted to practice law in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. Read her full rc.com bio here.

Read more about Linn Foster FreedmanEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor, Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider
  • Organization:
    Robinson & Cole LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo