Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

CBP Seeks Comments on New Heightened Import Disclosures for Supply Chain Transparency

By Nithya Nagarajan & Dimitri Zografi on October 5, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Close-up zoom of customs officer stamping “IMPORT TARIFF PAID” on cargo paperwork, blurred shipping containers in background, logistics port atmosphere, documentary editorial style

On September 2, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (Notice), titled Heightened Import Disclosures for Supply Chain Visibility (Docket No. USCBP-2026-1058; RIN 1685-AA47).

The Notice, issued as part of Executive Order 14411, “Strengthening Customs Enforcement,” aims to enhance transparency across supply chains and strengthen efforts to detect and prevent illicit imports, including illegal transshipment. To achieve this, CBP is exploring significant changes to import filing and record keeping processes.

CBP indicated in its Notice that it will focus on key areas which include:

  1. Enhanced Documentation Requirements. Importers may be required to obtain and submit foreign export documentation—such as export declarations, commercial invoices, packing lists, certificates of origin, export licenses, and transport documents—that foreign exporters already file with their own customs authorities. This would allow CBP to cross-check U.S. entry filings against foreign data to detect discrepancies, such as dual-invoicing. CBP is also weighing whether certain high-risk product categories should be subject to mandatory submission of this documentation as a condition of entry.
  2. Global Business Identifiers. CBP acknowledges that the longstanding Manufacturer Identification Code (MID) provides limited identifying information, is not always unique, and is often unavailable early enough in the entry process to be useful. The agency is evaluating whether to replace or supplement the MID with Global Business Identifiers (GBIs) that are currently the subject of a voluntary test program designed to improve visibility into manufacturers, shippers, and sellers across the supply chain.
  3. Technology and AI Integration. Citing illegal transshipment as a direct threat to lawful revenue and economic security, CBP intends to leverage artificial intelligence and private-sector traceability technologies to flag transshipment risk earlier in the import process. The agency is also considering whether CTPAT participants should be required to adopt and disclose such technologies to CBP, with particular attention to security risks posed by foreign-controlled logistics platforms

CBP has requested comments on several implementation considerations, including phased rollouts by entry type, commodity, country, or mode of transportation; tailored timelines for small entities, foreign importers, and CTPAT participants; and the costs and benefits of the proposals, including potential effects on critical goods such as medical products. Comments are due by December 1, 2026, and may be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal under Docket No. USCBP-2026-1058.

The Husch Blackwell International Trade and Supply Chain team will continue to monitor this and provide updates as they become available. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact your Husch Blackwell attorney.

Tags: AI
Photo of Nithya Nagarajan Nithya Nagarajan

Nithya’s extensive background in U.S. trade issues spans 25 years and includes various roles in a number of federal government agencies, including the Department of Commerce Department of Justice, and the U.S. Court of International Trade. She assists clients with administrative and regulatory…

Nithya’s extensive background in U.S. trade issues spans 25 years and includes various roles in a number of federal government agencies, including the Department of Commerce Department of Justice, and the U.S. Court of International Trade. She assists clients with administrative and regulatory actions before the Department of Commerce, International Trade Commission and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and defends clients in appeals before the Court of International Trade, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, NAFTA panels and the World Trade Organization. In addition to her body of U.S. experience, Nithya is also well-versed in international trade issues in China and India.

Read more about Nithya NagarajanEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Dimitri Zografi Dimitri Zografi

Dimitri assists clients with international trade and tax matters. His practice centers on Customs compliance, trade remedies, and sophisticated cross-border regulatory strategy. He counsels U.S. and foreign clients on a wide range of complex trade issues, including antidumping and countervailing duty investigations, Section

…

Dimitri assists clients with international trade and tax matters. His practice centers on Customs compliance, trade remedies, and sophisticated cross-border regulatory strategy. He counsels U.S. and foreign clients on a wide range of complex trade issues, including antidumping and countervailing duty investigations, Section 301 and 232 tariffs, IEEPA compliance, country-of-origin determinations, scope rulings, and Customs enforcement proceedings.

Read more about Dimitri ZografiEmailDimitri's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Antitrust, Competition and Trade
  • Blog:
    International Trade Insights
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo