Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Indemnity costs order refused

By Bill Madden on February 17, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
letter-b-black-icon-17.png

Coffey v Murrumbidgee Local Health District formerly known as Greater Murray Area Health Service [2020] NSWSC 80 (available on Caselaw) saw a defendant’s application for an indemnity costs order resisted by the plaintiff.

The substantial burden of the plaintiff’s submissions was that the offer of compromise was made too soon, in the sense that the evidence was not then complete on either side, so that it was in effect unreasonable for the defendant to expect or require the plaintiff on pain of a possible indemnity costs order to make a fundamental decision about the strength of her case with less than full information (see [19]).

The order for costs was made only on an ordinary basis, with the court stating at [22]:

In my opinion it was not unreasonable for the plaintiff, at the time that the offer was made, not to accept it. It would not in my view have been possible or reasonable to expect that the plaintiff could have given any consideration to the defendant’s offer at the time it was made that did not involve an unacceptable degree of speculation.

  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    Bill Madden's Blog
  • Organization:
    Bill Madden
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo