Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Conduct: Plagiarism by medical practitioner.

By Bill Madden on November 21, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Barnold Law blog has drawn attention to a decision from last year, Medical Board of Australia v Soh (Review and Regulation) [2019] VCAT 1549 (available on AUSTLII).

Based on agreed facts, the Tribunal found that the doctor’s conduct breached principles of the Good Medical Practice: A Code of Conduct for Doctors in Australia March 2014 (clause 8.9) and was professional misconduct.

The doctor had claimed authorship of an article which was published in Annals of Medicine and Surgery but was in fact plagarised by an article written by others which was published in the Journal of Radiology, Research and Practice a few months earlier. The doctor used the plagiarised article to gain entry to the Surgical Education and Training in General Surgery program of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Orders were made including a reprimand, a fine an that the doctor’s registration be subject to conditions requiring him to undertake education on ethics, specifically academic integrity and research ethics.

  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Bill Madden's Blog
  • Organization:
    Bill Madden
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo