Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FTC: “All Natural” Must be 100% Natural

By Hunton & Williams LLP & Phyllis H. Marcus on April 14, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On April 12, 2016, the Federal Trade Commission announced a package of four settlements and one lawsuit against the marketers of sunscreen, body lotion and hair care products. Each of these matters was brought in the FTC’s administrative forum and allege a single count: that the products could not be considered all natural because each product contained at least one synthetic ingredient.

The companies – ABS Consumer Products, Beyond Coastal, California Naturel, The Erickson Marketing Group Inc., and Trans-India Products, Inc. – focused their marketing claims on the products’ ingredients found in nature. Claims including “all natural,” “100% natural” and “only the purest, most luxurious and effective ingredients found in nature,” were made for ingredients such as Vitamin C, Shea Butter, Pomegranate extract, Marigold Flower extract, Aloe Vera, Wheatgerm, Apricot, Borage or Coconut oil. While the products appear to have contained such ingredients, they could not be labeled as all natural because, according to the FTC, they also contained items such as Dimethicone, Caprylyl Glycol, Polyethylene, Butyloctyl Salicylate, Neopentyl Glycol Diethylhexanoate, or Ethylhexyl Glycerin.

Four of the companies involved settled with the FTC. In identical agreements, the companies promised not to claim – expressly or by implication – in connection with the marketing of any product, including through the use of a product name, trademark or trade name:

  • whether such products are “all natural” or “100% natural”;
  • the extent to which such products contain any natural or synthetic ingredient or component;
  • the ingredients or composition of such products; or
  • the environmental or health benefits of such products,

unless the claim is non-misleading. The consent agreements require the companies to possess and rely upon competent and reliable evidence to establish any “natural,” ingredient, environmental or health claims made in the future. At a minimum, these agreements will be in effect for the next 20 years. The fifth company involved, California Naturel, is engaged in litigation with the FTC.

Download the full alert.

  • Posted in:
    Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    Hunton Retail Law Resource
  • Organization:
    Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo