In my latest Daily Journal of Commerce Construction column, I discuss the issue of whether a contractor may sue a lender. This occasionally arises when a project’s owner runs into trouble and the construction lender stops funding. The argument that is occasionally advanced is that the lender knew the contractor had started work and, if it did not intend to advance the loan funds, it should have notified the contractor immediately, rather than remaining silent while the contractor proceeded. The contractor can legitimately point out in these circumstances that it was unfair of the lender to stand by silently while the contractor added value to the lender’s collateral.

Read the full article at the Daily Journal of Commerce website. Subscribers only.

Photo of Kip Childs Kip Childs

Kip Childs is a member of Stoel Rives LLP practicing in the Construction and Design group. Kip has extensive trial experience and has been heavily involved in both prosecuting and defending construction defect, delay, impact and design claims. He regularly participates in mediations…

Kip Childs is a member of Stoel Rives LLP practicing in the Construction and Design group. Kip has extensive trial experience and has been heavily involved in both prosecuting and defending construction defect, delay, impact and design claims. He regularly participates in mediations and settlement conferences, and assists clients with negotiating and drafting construction and design contracts. Kip also practices with the firm’s Business Insolvency & Financial Services practice group and has significant experience in the areas of bankruptcy, commercial and general debtor-creditor law.He has represented both secured and unsecured creditors in numerous bankruptcy reorganizations and has extensive experience litigating bankruptcy preference, lien avoidance, priority and plan confirmation disputes.