Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

New York State Courts Increase Privacy Protections for Litigation Filings

By Charles J. Nerko on March 4, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Confidential

To deter identity theft and other abuses, New York state courts are now requiring litigants filing papers in civil actions to omit or redact certain confidential personal information. These new requirements are similar to the privacy protections effective in federal courts since 2007.  See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2.

By statute, New York has long required Social Security numbers to be removed or redacted from court filings. See N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 399-ddd(6); N.Y. Pub. Off. Law § 96-a(1). The new privacy rule now addresses these additional types of personally identifiable information:

  • taxpayer identification numbers, including not only Social Security numbers but also employer identification numbers;
  • dates of birth;
  • minors’ names; and
  • financial account numbers, including credit card, debit card, bank account, investment account and insurance account numbers.

The rule allows court filings to include truncated versions of this information, which means parties may file the last four digits of taxpayer identification and financial account numbers, an individual’s year of birth and a minor’s initials. See N.Y. Uniform Civil Rules of the Supreme and County Courts, 22 NYCRR § 202.5.

This rule covers cases filed electronically on the NYS Courts Electronic Filing System and paper-filed cases. The rule, however, exempts matrimonial actions, proceedings in Surrogate’s Court or pursuant to Article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law, all of which have their own privacy protections. Further, in actions arising out of a consumer credit transaction, when a defendant denies responsibility for an identified account, the plaintiff may, without leave of court, amend its pleading under seal to include the full account information.

The rule places the redaction responsibility on the party submitting the papers to a court. Parties may apply for a court order to include unredacted confidential personal information for “good cause.”

A full copy of the new rule is available at the website for the Uniform Rules for N.Y.S. Trial Courts.

Photo of Charles J. Nerko Charles J. Nerko

As a litigator in our Complex Litigation group, Charles Nerko represents clients in commercial disputes before state and federal courts, administrative agencies, and arbitration tribunals. He helps clients resolve their most important and sensitive litigation dealing with contracts, business torts, data privacy, and…

As a litigator in our Complex Litigation group, Charles Nerko represents clients in commercial disputes before state and federal courts, administrative agencies, and arbitration tribunals. He helps clients resolve their most important and sensitive litigation dealing with contracts, business torts, data privacy, and intellectual property. Mr. Nerko’s experience includes pretrial investigation, provisional relief, motion practice, discovery, witness preparation, alternative dispute resolution, trial, and appeals. Prior to joining Vedder Price, Mr. Nerko was a litigation associate at an Am Law A-List firm and volunteered as a Law Clerk to the Honorable Loretta A. Preska, Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Mr. Nerko received his law degree cum laude from Fordham University School of Law, where he was a Notes & Articles Editor of the Law Review and served as a Member of the Moot Court Board.

Read more about Charles J. NerkoEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Media & Privacy Risk Report
  • Organization:
    Vedder Price PC
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo