Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Size Protest Amendments to the FAR Are Coming

By Aron C. Beezley, Nathaniel J. Greeson & Owen E. Salyers on October 11, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Size Protest Amendments to the FAR Are Coming

The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) has made multiple changes to its regulations over the last decade, including final rules published in the Federal Register on October 2, 2013 (78 FR 61113), October 16, 2020 (85 FR 66146), and November 29, 2023 (87 FR 73400). Theses final rules published by the SBA clarified various aspects about size protests related to set-aside contracts and orders awarded to various small business concerns (i.e., HUBZone small businesses, service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses (SDVOSB), economically disadvantaged women-owned small businesses (EDWOSB), and women-owned small businesses (WOSB)).

In response to the SBA’s regulation changes, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council recently proposed amendments to the Federal Acquisitions Regulation (FAR) to harmonize the SBA regulations (13 CFR) with the FAR (48 CFR).   

The proposed rule outlines four amendments to various sections of the FAR:

  • FAR 19.302(a)(2) – Clarifies which entities may initiate a size status protest by referencing the SBA’s regulations found at 13 CFR 121.1001(a).
  • FAR 19.302(d)(1) – Specifies when size protests are due on negotiated procurements (including protests on partial set-asides and reserves of multiple-award contracts and set-asides of orders against multiple-award contracts). The modification includes exceptions for orders and blanket purchase agreements placed under the Federal Supply Schedule. This modification implements the SBA’s regulations found at 13 CFR 121.1004(a)(2).
  • FAR 19.306, 19.307, and 19.308 – Specifies when protests are due for orders placed under multiple-award contracts where the contracting officer requested re-representation of status. This modification implements the SBA’s regulations found at 13 CFR 126.801(d), 13 CFR 134.1004(a), and 13 CFR 127.603(c).
  • FAR 19.306, 19.307, and 19.308 – Specifies when protests are due for orders set aside for HUBZone, SDVOSB, or EDWOSB/WOSB concerns when the multiple-award contract is not itself partially or totally set-aside or reserved for the particular concern.  This modification includes exceptions for orders and blanket purchase agreements placed under the Federal Supply Schedule. This modification implements the SBA’s regulations found at 13 CFR 126.801(d), 13 CFR 134.1004(a), and 13 CFR 127.603(c).

The proposed rule does not create any new solicitation provisions or contract clauses, nor does it impact any existing provisions or clauses.

Comments on the proposed rule are due by December 4, 2023.  

If you have any questions about these developments, please do not hesitate to contact Aron Beezley, Nathaniel Greeson, or Owen Salyers.

Photo of Aron C. Beezley Aron C. Beezley

Aron Beezley is the co-leader of Bradley’s nationally ranked Government Contracts Practice Group. Ranked nationally himself in Government Contracts Law by Chambers, Law360, Benchmark Litigation, and Super Lawyers, Aron’s vast experience includes representation of government contractors in numerous industries…

Aron Beezley is the co-leader of Bradley’s nationally ranked Government Contracts Practice Group. Ranked nationally himself in Government Contracts Law by Chambers, Law360, Benchmark Litigation, and Super Lawyers, Aron’s vast experience includes representation of government contractors in numerous industries and in all aspects of the government-contracting process, including negotiation, award, performance and termination.

Read more about Aron C. BeezleyEmailAron's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Nathaniel J. Greeson Nathaniel J. Greeson

Nathaniel Greeson helps clients solve government contracts challenges. Nathaniel represents clients in a range of government procurement issues, including bid protests, claims, disputes, audits and investigations. He has extensive experience with GAO bid protests, agency-level protests, Court of Federal Claims (COFC) bid protests…

Nathaniel Greeson helps clients solve government contracts challenges. Nathaniel represents clients in a range of government procurement issues, including bid protests, claims, disputes, audits and investigations. He has extensive experience with GAO bid protests, agency-level protests, Court of Federal Claims (COFC) bid protests, and SBA OHA size and NAICS appeals, as well as experience with agency-level requests for equitable adjustments (REA) and claims, and Boards of Contract Appeals claims. View articles by Nathaniel.

Read more about Nathaniel J. GreesonEmailNathaniel's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Owen E. Salyers Owen E. Salyers
Read more about Owen E. SalyersEmail
  • Posted in:
    Government Contracts
  • Blog:
    BuildSmart
  • Organization:
    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo