Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

IRS Private Letter Ruling Recognizes a Valid Nontax Purpose for Aggregating Mineral Interests When Computing Depletion Under Section 611

By Leon H. Rittenberg III, Caroline Lafourcade & Jack Aguillard on August 25, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
blog post pictures (18)

On July 25, 2025, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released Private Letter Ruling 202530002, where it summarized the requirements for aggregating separate nonoperating mineral interests into a single property under Section 614(e) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and Section 1.614-5(d) of the Treasury Regulations (Regulations) for purposes of computing the depletion deduction. Under Section 611(a) of the Code, a taxpayer may take a deduction for the depletion of natural resources when determining taxable income from production, permitting a taxpayer to account for the reduction of reserves.

The allowance for depletion, whether it be via cost depletion under Section 612 of the Code or percentage depletion under Section 613 of the Code, depends in part either on the basis in the property for cost depletion, or the gross income from the property for percentage depletion. With respect to mines, wells, and other natural resources, Section 614(a) of the Code defines “property” as “each separate interest owned by the taxpayer in each mineral deposit in each separate tract or parcel of land,” while each “interest” a taxpayer owns is an economic interest in a mineral deposit which is generally, per Section 1.614-1(a)(2) of the Regulations, a working or operating interest, royalty interest, or profits interest. The subject taxpayer owned mineral royalty interests via separate leases, each covering a distinct tract of land – seemingly each a separate “property” for purposes of Section 614 of the Code. However, Section 614(e) of the Code provides that a taxpayer who owns two or more separate nonoperating mineral interests in a single tract of land or in two or more adjacent tracts is, upon the requisite showing, permitted to treat the mineral interests in each deposit as one “property”. The subject taxpayer, who is not responsible for the costs of exploration, development, or production, owns nonoperating mineral interests.

Per Section 1.614-5(d) of the Regulations, a taxpayer owning nonoperating interests in two or more adjacent tracts of land (i.e., tracts that are, depending on the facts and circumstances, “in reasonably close proximity to each other”) can make the requisite showing to the IRS for permission to aggregate by establishing that the avoidance of tax is not a principal purpose for aggregation. Section 1.614-5(d) of the Regulations further states that a substantial reduction in tax from the aggregation of interests is evidence that the principal purpose of aggregation is tax avoidance.

In PLR 202530002, the IRS summarized the three-step process, derived from Section 614(e) of the Code and Section 1.614-5 of the Regulations, that a taxpayer must follow to obtain permission to aggregate nonoperating mineral interests. Specifically, a taxpayer must:

  1. Submit to the IRS an application for permission to aggregate the interests within 90 days after the beginning of the first taxable year for which aggregation is desired, or within 90 days after the acquisition of one of the properties to be included in the aggregation (Section 1.614-5(e)(1) of the Regulations);
  2. Include with the application a description of the interests within the tract(s), accompanied by maps appropriately marked and accurately circumscribing the scope of the aggregation (Section 1.614-5(e)(4) of the Regulations); and
  3. Establish, through the inclusion in the application of a complete statement of facts upon which the taxpayer relies, that a principal purpose for aggregating the interests is not tax avoidance (Sections 1.614-5(d) and (e) of the Regulations).

In PLR 202530002, the taxpayer represented that the principal purpose of the request to aggregate was not tax avoidance, but instead to reduce the administrative burden caused by calculating depletion without aggregation and to implement consistent treatment for accounting and income tax purposes. Finding that the taxpayer satisfied the requirements of Section 614(e) of the Code and Section 1.614-5 of the Regulations, the IRS consented to the taxpayer aggregating its separate nonoperating mineral interests located at the two leased properties. PLR 202530002, in addition to summarizing the time-sensitive requirements for a taxpayer to aggregate nonoperating mineral interests into a single property for purposes of computing depletion under Section 611 of the Code, can serve as a useful reminder to mineral interest owners that the principal purpose of a requested aggregation cannot be the avoidance of tax. In the case of the subject taxpayer, the reduction of the administrative burden of depletion calculations, coupled with the ability to implement consistent treatment for accounting and income tax purposes as a result of aggregation, constituted a sufficient principal purpose.

For further questions regarding this topic, contact Liskow attorneys Leon Rittenberg III, Caroline Lafourcade, and Jack Aguillard and visit our Tax practice page.

Photo of Leon H. Rittenberg III Leon H. Rittenberg III

Leon Rittenberg III is a New Orleans native. His practice focuses on serving the needs of small and mid-sized businesses and their owners; including philanthropy and non-profit law, taxation, finance, private equity, estate planning, probate, real estate, mergers and acquisitions and related matters.

Leon Rittenberg III is a New Orleans native. His practice focuses on serving the needs of small and mid-sized businesses and their owners; including philanthropy and non-profit law, taxation, finance, private equity, estate planning, probate, real estate, mergers and acquisitions and related matters. Leon represents the interests of a number of private investors, oil service businesses, marine transportation companies and physician groups. He is a Board Certified Tax Specialist and Board Certified Estate Planning & Administration Specialist, as certified by the Louisiana Board of Legal Specialization. He frequently lectures in areas such as taxation, estate planning and maritime transactions.

Leon is a Fellow of the American College of Tax Counsel. He has been recognized by Chambers USA (Louisiana Marine Finance – 2021; Louisiana Corporate/M&A: Tax section – 2017), Louisiana Super Lawyers (Tax, Estate Planning & Probate and Business/Corporate), and the Best Lawyers in America (Non-Profit/Charities Law and Trusts & Estates) since 2007, and by New Orleans Magazine as one of their “Top Lawyers of New Orleans” for his work in Equipment Finance Law, Mergers & Acquisitions Law and Tax Law. New Orleans City Business selected him for their Leadership in Law class of 2014, which “identifies and honors 50 outstanding legal professionals whose successes in law and contributions to the community have set the pace for the legal community.”

Read more about Leon H. Rittenberg IIIEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Caroline Lafourcade Caroline Lafourcade
Read more about Caroline LafourcadeEmail
Photo of Jack Aguillard Jack Aguillard
Read more about Jack AguillardEmail
  • Posted in:
    Tax
  • Blog:
    Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Liskow & Lewis
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo