Teleconference Links: Do You Dare Even Say “Eminent Domain” After Kelo?
Here are links to the cases and other materials we spoke about at today’s teleconference with Professor Dan Mandelker and my OCA colleague Dwight Merriam:
- Ilagan v. Ungacta (Guam v. 162.40 Square Meters of Land)
- “Solely” for economic development? Missouri ex rel. Jackson v. Dolan
- Ilya Somin, The Judicial Reaction to Kelo, 4 Alb. Gov’t L. Rev. 1 (2011)
- Ilya Somin, The Limits of Backlash: Assessing the Political Response to Kelo, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 2100 (2009)
- Texas trilogy: Whittingthon, Heart’s Bluff, Enbridge
- Pipeline takings: Colorado
- Pipeline takings: Montana
- Pipeline takings: Texas
- Is eminent domain abuse outrageous government conduct? Not according to the Second Circuit (49 Wb v. LLC v. Village of Haverstraw)
- Takings and the Equal Footing Doctrine (United States v. 32.42 Acres of Land)
- What is “aboriginal land” immune from eminent domain? (Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. Dep’t of Environmental Protection)
- Takings in Indian Country, part II (Grand Canyon Skywalk Dev. LLC v. Sa Nyu Wa, Inc.)
Originally published at inversecondemnation.lexblogplatformfour.com
Citation
Robert H. Thomas, Teleconference Links: Do You Dare Even Say “Eminent Domain” After Kelo?, inversecondemnation.com (June 10, 2013) [The Library at LexBlog, LEX-WK-MZ3HH74A, lexpid.org/MZ3HH74A]
Filed under
Practice Area
Organization