Skip to main content

Health Law Prof Blog

Adverse Selection and Equity in Insurance Markets with Guaranteed Renewable Contracts: Evidence from Chile

By Katharine Van Tassel

Cristian Figueroa (Boston College), Adverse Selection and Equity in Insurance Markets with Guaranteed Renewable Contracts: Evidence from Chile (2022):

In theory, guaranteed renewable (GR) insurance contracts can efficiently insure against reclassification risk without causing adverse selection on pre-existing conditions. In practice, however, adverse selection can still arise on other dimensions. In 2020, in response to protests demanding gender equality, Chile banned gender-based pricing in its private health insurance market. I investigate how this policy impacts Chile’s health care system, which consists of a low-quality public option and a private market characterized by the use of GR contracts. I find that, if the ban is implemented, prices in the private market would increase by more than 30% as low-cost men switch to the public option and high-cost women enter. Overall, the regulation causes annual consumer surplus to increase $373 per insured woman and decrease $279 per insured man, which is around 2% and 1% of average annual per capita income, respectively. The ban is regressive, as high-income groups benefit more than low-income groups, creating a trade-off between gender-based equity and income-based equity. Subsidies that induce low-cost enrollees to remain in the private market are the most effective mitigation strategy to contain higher premiums. Finally, relative to non-GR contracts, the number of individuals choosing the private market is lower under guaranteed renewability.

Originally published at lawprofessors.typepad.com

Citation

Katharine Van Tassel, Adverse Selection and Equity in Insurance Markets with Guaranteed Renewable Contracts: Evidence from Chile, Health Law Prof Blog (January 16, 2023) [The Library at LexBlog, LEX-WK-SEC8147N, lexpid.org/SEC8147N]

View the record

Filed under