Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

SILENCE SHATTERS TRUST: SALMONELLA SAINTPAUL OUTBREAK TIED TO MANGOES ENDS WITHOUT INDUSTRY COMMENTARY 

By Bill Marler on March 22, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Well said!

The recent investigation into the Salmonella Saintpaul outbreak, which sickened 56 people across the United States, has officially been closed by the FDA and CDC. 

While public health officials confirmed that mangoes were the definitive source of the illnesses, the investigation concluded only after the affected fruit was past its shelf life and no longer available for sale. 

This timing has allowed the National Mango Board (NMB) to maintain a conspicuous silence on the matter, a move that critics and food safety advocates suggest prioritizes brand protection over consumer transparency. 

Despite the confirmed link between the outbreak and the fruit, the NMB has yet to issue a formal statement or provide the “radical transparency” often demanded by the public when retail products lead to hospitalizations.  

The NMB’s current lack of response stands in stark contrast to its handling of the 2012 Salmonella Braenderup outbreak, where the organization was forced to navigate the FDA’s “high-risk” designation for mangoes. During that crisis, the board actively communicated with growers and retailers, even as they grappled with the logistical “mess” of using Price Look-Up (PLU) codes for recalls. Today, the strategy appears to have shifted toward a quiet closure of the books. 

With the FDA declining to name the specific brands or suppliers involved in this latest Saintpaul episode—citing that the risk to the public has passed—the industry has been granted a reprieve from public accountability, leaving consumers in the dark about whose mangoes were responsible for the 56 confirmed cases.  

As the industry moves forward, the silence from the National Mango Board raises significant concerns regarding the efficacy of current food safety protocols and the commitment to industry-wide improvements. 

Without a public acknowledgment or a detailed analysis of how the Salmonella Saintpaul contamination occurred, the opportunity to prevent future occurrences is being squandered. 

For an organization that prides itself on promoting the health benefits and safety of mangoes, the decision to remain silent during a documented outbreak serves as a sobering reminder of the friction between market promotion and public health responsibility.

Will Cavan, Publisher, Mango World Magazine

Photo of Bill Marler Bill Marler

Bill Marler is an accomplished personal injury lawyer and national expert on foodborne illness litigation. He began representing victims of foodborne illness in 1993, when he represented Brianne Kiner, the most seriously injured survivor of the Jack in the Box E. coli O157:H7…

Bill Marler is an accomplished personal injury lawyer and national expert on foodborne illness litigation. He began representing victims of foodborne illness in 1993, when he represented Brianne Kiner, the most seriously injured survivor of the Jack in the Box E. coli O157:H7 outbreak, resulting in her landmark $15.6 million settlement. Marler founded Food Safety News in 2009.

Read more about Bill MarlerEmailBill's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    Marler Blog
  • Organization:
    Marler Clark, Inc., PS
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo