Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Delaware Supreme Court Rejects Application of the “Bump-Up” Exclusion in Harman Decision

By Tamara D. Bruno, Chris Popecki & Hadhy Ayaz on March 25, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

When corporate transactions engender shareholder litigation, Directors’ and Officers’ liability insurers all too often invoke the so-called “bump-up” exclusion to bar coverage of such claims. These provisions, common in D&O policies, purport to exclude coverage for settlements or judgments that effectively increase the deal price in acquisitions, the theory being that D&O insurance was not intended to act as a backstop to the share price obtained by management in selling a company. D&O insurers have for years tried to expand the application of these provisions in attempts to narrow Side B/C coverage for M&A transaction-related losses.

Continue Reading ›

  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Policyholder Pulse
  • Organization:
    Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo