Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Google appeals landmark ruling that Google had a monopoly on Search!

By Peter Vogel on May 23, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Logo, Google Sydney
Mitchell Luo, Unsplash

The NewYorkTimes.com reported that “Google asked a federal appeals court on Friday to reverse a landmark ruling that branded the company a monopolist in online search.”  The May 22, 2026 article entitled ” Google Appeals Landmark Ruling Declaring It a Monopolist in Search” (https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/22/technology/google-appeals-search-case.html) included these comments from Reporter David McCabe:

The Department of Justice sued Google in 2020, arguing that the tech giant had abused its monopoly to maintain its dominance over online search. In 2024, a U.S. District Court judge agreed with the government, ruling that Google had broken the law when it paid companies, including Apple and Mozilla, to have its search engine appear as the first option on smartphones and in web browsers.

In a filing with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Google said the District Court judge, Amit P. Mehta, had improperly applied antitrust law in finding that those deals were over the line. Judge Mehta also overstepped when he issued a ruling to fix the monopoly concerns by forcing Google to share some data with its competitors, the company argued.

The appeal is the next turn in a yearslong battle between Google and the Department of Justice, which has resulted in the first major antitrust rulings against a tech giant in the modern internet era. The Justice Department also sued the company in 2023, claiming it had a monopoly in advertising technology. The government won that case, and the judge is expected to issue her decision on how to fix that monopoly this year.

In the search case, Judge Mehta’s ruling in 2024 on measures to address the monopoly, known as remedies, fell short of the breakup of Google that the government had sought. He said Google had to share some of the data that powered its search engine with competitors, which could include other search engines like Microsoft’s Bing and chatbots like ChatGPT.

In its appeal, Google took issue with both Judge Mehta’s original ruling and his decision on remedies. The judge’s ruling that the company violated federal antitrust law was “as basic an error of antitrust law as a court can make,” Google said in its filing.

“The court’s own findings establish that Google’s conduct was lawful,” the company said in the filing. “It developed a superior search engine through hard work, bold innovation and shrewd business decisions.”

What do you think about Google’s monopoly?

First published at https://www.vogelitlaw.com/blog/google-appeals-landmark-ruling-that-google-had-a-monopoly-on-search

  • Posted in:
    Antitrust, Competition and Trade
  • Blog:
    Internet, IT & e-Discovery
  • Organization:
    Peter S. Vogel PC
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo