Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

EU Biotech Act II: One Week Remaining to Shape the Commission’s Approach

By Bart Van Vooren, Wolfgang Maschek & Yuliya Gevrenova on June 3, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Table of Contents

  • 1. What is the EU Biotech Act II?
  • 2. What will the Act regulate?
  • 3. What Measures are being considered?
  • Regulatory Simplification
  • Market Creation
  • Support for Scale-up
  • 4. What Information should Companies submit?

The European Commission’s Call for Evidence on the upcoming Biotech Act II is open until 10 June 2026, with one week remaining for companies to provide input.  Companies should consider engaging now to help shape the outcome.

The initiative is expected to have a broad impact across sectors including chemicals, agriculture, agri-biotech, food and feed, consumer products, and industrial manufacturing, as part of a wider EU effort to scale biotechnology and biomanufacturing as an alternative to fossil-based production.

This blog outlines what the Biotech Act II is expected to cover, which parts of the value chain may be affected, the types of measures under consideration, and how companies can engage in the current consultation. 

Link to 1. What is the EU Biotech Act II? 1. What is the EU Biotech Act II?

The EU Biotech Act II is the Commission’s planned initiative on industrial biotechnology and biomanufacturing, complementing the earlier Biotech Act I, which as we reported, focuses primarily on health biotechnology.  The Biotech Act II is expected to have a much broader application and:

  • Establish a cross-sector framework for biotechnology and biomanufacturing.
  • Address industrial applications beyond health (e.g., chemicals, consumer products, food and feed, agri-food).
  • Cover the entire value chain, from feedstock sourcing and processing to manufacturing, scale-up and market deployment.

Importantly, the initiative reflects a broader policy shift from product-based regulation toward value chain and market-shaping approaches.   Rather than introducing a standalone regulatory regime, the Act is likely to combine simplification and alignment of existing rules, enabling frameworks for scale-up and innovation, and market-creation tools to drive uptake.

Link to 2. What will the Act regulate? 2. What will the Act regulate?

Although the Biotech Act II will affect a wide range of sectors, its defining feature is that it operates across both products and the conditions under which they are developed and brought to market.

  • Bio-based chemicals and materials, e.g., polymers, textiles, plastics.
  • Agriculture and Agri-biotech, e.g., fertilizers, plant protection products.
  • Food and feed, e.g., GMOs, NGTs, labelling.
  • Biofuels, e.g., SAF, biodiesel, algal fuel.
  • Cross-sector “biosolutions” (e.g., enzymes, microbial products)
  • Feedstock sourcing (e.g., biomass, recycled carbon).
  • Biomanufacturing processes (e.g., fermentation, synthetic biology).

Link to 3. What Measures are being considered? 3. What Measures are being considered?

At this stage, the initiative remains at the Call for Evidence phase.  However, the Commission has already identified several key intervention areas:

Link to Regulatory Simplification Regulatory Simplification

  • Improving Competitiveness through streamlining permitting and authorization procedures for bio-based products.
  • Enabling Cross-Sector Innovation by addressing fragmentation in existing regulations, e.g., through harmonised interpretation across Member States and EU Agencies.
  • Regulatory Innovation and Support Measures by expanding the use of regulatory sandboxes and pilot frameworks to a broader range of bio-based products.

Link to Market Creation Market Creation

  • Creating Lead Markets for EU-based Production through demand-side measures (e.g., minimum content requirements, public procurement measures), particularly in sectors such as chemicals, plastics, textiles, construction and fertilisers.
  • Replacing fossil-based raw material use through measures such as minimum content requirements to incentivize the use of bio-based and recycled carbon inputs, particularly in sectors such as chemicals, plastics and fuels.

Link to Support for Scale-up Support for Scale-up

  • Building a circular bioeconomy by introducing sustainability criteria for biomass and feedstocks use.
  • Supporting investment and scale-up by improving investment predictability and access to funding for industrial biomanufacturing.

Link to 4. What Information should Companies submit? 4. What Information should Companies submit?

The current Call for Evidence invites practical, evidence-based input, including:

  • Concrete regulatory barriers through examples of overlapping or inconsistent requirements (e.g., duplicative risk assessments, unclear classification, diverging Member State implementation).
  • Investment and scale-up constraints through examples of financing challenges, including delayed or foregone investments, long return-on-investment timelines, and barriers to scaling first-of-a-kind industrial facilities in the EU.
  • Data or examples demonstrating difficulties in competing with fossil-based incumbents (e.g., price differentials or limited market uptake despite regulatory approval).
  • Feedback on proposed measures.

Companies should be mindful that responses will become publicly available on the Commission’s “Have Your Say” portal unless confidentiality is requested, which may influence how commercially sensitive information is presented.

***

Should you require assistance in assessing how the proposed Biotech Act II may affect your activities, or wish to engage in the ongoing consultation process, the Covington team is available to support you.  Please do get in touch with Bart Van Vooren: bvanvooren@cov.com

Photo of Bart Van Vooren Bart Van Vooren

Bart Van Vooren, partner leads a dynamic practice at the intersection of EU regulatory law, global health, and biodiversity law. In these fields, he advises innovative pharmaceutical, food, cosmetic and technology companies on complex EU and global regulatory, compliance and policy assignments.

Bart…

Bart Van Vooren, partner leads a dynamic practice at the intersection of EU regulatory law, global health, and biodiversity law. In these fields, he advises innovative pharmaceutical, food, cosmetic and technology companies on complex EU and global regulatory, compliance and policy assignments.

Bart holds a Ph.D. in EU and International Law and was a professor of EU law until 2013. During that time, he wrote the first-ever handbook with Cambridge University Press on “EU External Relations Law” (2014). He then transitioned to private practice, and frequently acted for the Belgian government before the EU Court of Justice (e.g. C-16/16P Belgium vs Commission). Bart joined Covington in 2016, leading some of our most consequential EU litigation proceedings (e.g. C-311/18 “Schrems II”) over the years.  Having handled nearly 50 cases before the EU Court, he’s uniquely qualified to support our corporate clients in our most high-stakes disputes. Recent examples include T-189/21 Aloe Vera of Europe v Commission (which we won, so the Commission decided to appeal); as well as T-201/21 Covington & Burling and Van Vooren v Commission (which we also won, and hence is also on appeal).

As a pioneer in biodiversity law, over the past 15 years Bart has built a unique, global practice on Access and Benefit-Sharing (ABS) laws under the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Nagoya Protocol, the Plant Treaty, the High Seas Treaty and the WHO Pandemic Agreement. ABS compliance is critical when sourcing biological materials for life sciences R&D and I work with many of the world’s innovative life sciences companies on the whole range of e.g. transactional, contractual, compliance, IP, (EU) regulatory and litigation work relating to ABS. As biodiversity has increasingly become identified as a major commercial and financial risk to companies, so has the practice expanded to e.g. biodiversity credit markets, biodiversity insurance, biodiversity claims and advertising, and so on. Since April 2025, Bart has been appointed as the industry representative to the Steering Committee of the UN Biodiversity Fund that seeks funding from the private sector for biodiversity conservation and restoration.

Bart also pioneered our global health practice. He has advised pharmaceutical clients on seasonal and pandemic influenza since 2016. Since then, this practice area expanded to cover all matters relating to infectious diseases, and as of 2020, emergency preparedness and response (eg. WHO prequalification, International Coordination Group negotiations, Emergency Use Listing, International Health Regulations Rev 2024). He has been the pharmaceutical industry’s lead lawyer advising on the WHO Pandemic Treaty negotiations, adopted on 14 May 2025. Currently, he continues to advise on the work of the Intergovernmental Working Group (“IGWG”) teasing out the technical details of the “Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System” intended to create legally binding obligations on companies to commit vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics in case of a new global health emergency.

In Chambers rankings, clients have kindly described Bart as “very knowledgeable, action-focused and service-focused lawyer”, adding that he “really tries to find a way of working through challenges”, am “customer-oriented” and provide “sound advice and reasonable options for our business with pros and cons.”

Finally, Bart has an active pro bono practice assisting NGOs defending the human rights of persons with a disability through strategic litigation before the EU Court.

Read more about Bart Van VoorenEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Wolfgang Maschek Wolfgang Maschek

Wolfgang A. Maschek is the Head of the European Public Policy Practice based in the Brussels office. Wolfgang’s practice includes representing both private and public sector clients at EU and national level across various regulated industries and policy matters. With over two decades…

Wolfgang A. Maschek is the Head of the European Public Policy Practice based in the Brussels office. Wolfgang’s practice includes representing both private and public sector clients at EU and national level across various regulated industries and policy matters. With over two decades of experience leading public policy teams across various regulated industries, Wolfgang connects with clients by leveraging his extensive legal and regulatory expertise to overcome complex challenges and seize business opportunities in Europe. His experience includes areas such as international trade, foreign direct investment, technology and AI, financial services, healthcare, and environmental and chemicals policy.

For the last decade, Wolfgang successfully led the Brussels-based public policy team at an international law firm. Earlier in his career, Wolfgang served as Senior Counsel and Head of the European Regulatory and Public Affairs department at a global financial services provider. Between 2002 and 2006, Wolfgang represented the Austrian Central Bank in Brussels, where he was responsible for liaising with European institutions and advising on European developments affecting monetary policy and financial market supervision. Wolfgang’s experience also includes working at the European Commission and at the Oesterreichische Kontrollbank.

Wolfgang has consistently been recognized by Chambers Europe and other ranking platforms as a leading lawyer in the Government and Public Affairs field.

Read more about Wolfgang MaschekEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Yuliya Gevrenova Yuliya Gevrenova

Yuliya Gevrenova is an associate in the Life Sciences Practice Group. She advises clients across a wide range of regulatory, compliance and procedural issues, focusing on EU and Public International law.

Yuliya assists multinational companies in the food, feed, pharmaceutical and cosmetics sectors…

Yuliya Gevrenova is an associate in the Life Sciences Practice Group. She advises clients across a wide range of regulatory, compliance and procedural issues, focusing on EU and Public International law.

Yuliya assists multinational companies in the food, feed, pharmaceutical and cosmetics sectors to navigate complicated legal frameworks, including:

International Health law, including the impact of the WHO Pandemic treaty, the application of the International Health Regulations and the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework.
International Environmental law, including issues of access and benefit sharing under the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Nagoya protocol.
Food law, including labelling and claims; coordination with national authorities during withdrawals and recalls; special rules on flavorings and enzymes, as well as GMOs and NGTs.
Chemicals (REACH, plastics, pollutants, etc.) and Environmental regulations (CSDDD, Wastewater Directive, green washing, etc.).
Animal health issues, including animal testing, transportation and feed.

As part of her pro bono practice, Yuliya advises on complex litigation strategies aimed at defending the rights of people with mental disabilities.

Read more about Yuliya GevrenovaEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Other
  • Blog:
    Inside EU Life Sciences
  • Organization:
    Covington & Burling LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo