Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

NCAA Obtains Injunction Over “March Madness” and “Final Four” Trademarks

By Brooke Erdos Singer of Davis+Gilbert LLP & Louis P. DiLorenzo on April 25, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana sided with the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and awarded a permanent injunction against game developer Kizzang Inc. (Kizzang) over a mobile and online game that infringed the NCAA’s trademarks “March Madness” and “Final Four.”

Background
The NCAA administers inter-collegiate sports across the United States and is best known for the Division I Men’s Basketball Tournament, held in March each year. The NCAA owns a number of trademarks related to that tournament, most prominently “March Madness,” “Final Four,” “Elite Eight” and “Sweet Sixteen,” and does not permit using the NCAA’s name, trademarks or tickets in connection with marketing or promotional activities without prior approval.

Kizzang developed a mobile and online game under the names “Final Three” and “April Madness,” whereby users could enter their predictions about the outcomes of individual games in the Division I Men’s Basketball Tournament. Notwithstanding warnings from the NCAA, Kizzang continued offering the game, eventually filing for federal trademark registrations for the marks “Final Three” and “April Madness.”

In response, the NCAA filed oppositions with the U.S. Patent and Trademark office in February 2017, and soon thereafter filed suit in federal court alleging that “Final Three” and “April Madness” were confusingly similar to the NCAA’s marks “Final Four” and “March Madness.”

The Ruling
The court found Kizzang in default in November 2017, and in January 2018, issued a permanent injunction against Kizzang, finding that the phrases “April Madness” and “Final Three” were similar to the NCAA’s marks and had a strong potential to cause confusion.

In light of the obvious similarity to the NCAA’s marks and Kizzang’s use in connection with the Division I Men’s Basketball Tournament, the court also found that Kizzang’s use rose to the level of willful infringement, and therefore found Kizzang liable for the NCAA’s attorneys’ fees.

BOTTOM LINE

The NCAA has a history of diligently monitoring “Final Four,” “March Madness” and other trademarks connected to the Division I Men’s Basketball Tournament, and will be quick to act on unauthorized uses, especially when used to market or promote third-party products. Although trademarks associated with popular events (including the Super Bowl, Oscars and Olympics) can be a compelling way to connect with consumers, brands and agencies should consult counsel before seeking to leverage the trademarks of any entity to avoid possible and costly litigation.


Connect with Brooke on LinkedIn

Connect with Louis on LinkedIn

Photo of Brooke Erdos Singer of Davis+Gilbert LLP Brooke Erdos Singer of Davis+Gilbert LLP

Brooke Erdos Singer helps clients achieve brand success, coordinating the myriad of trademark, contract, advertising and marketing issues businesses face. She advises a wide variety of U.S. and international clients that range from startups to celebrities and iconic brands. 

Brooke takes a 360-degree…

Brooke Erdos Singer helps clients achieve brand success, coordinating the myriad of trademark, contract, advertising and marketing issues businesses face. She advises a wide variety of U.S. and international clients that range from startups to celebrities and iconic brands. 

Brooke takes a 360-degree view of brands, and is often involved at the outset of product or campaign development. Because she combines counseling, transactional and litigation experience, Brooke is able to anticipate how creative decisions may play out in various scenarios. Clients rely on her for guidance on trademark clearance, prosecution, portfolio management, brand monetization, brand protection and enforcement. Acting as an integral member of the client’s team, she is a valued early reviewer who can spot risk and find commercially viable alternatives when needed. In addition, her insights help clients navigate international legal and cultural issues in marketing campaigns.

Clients appreciate Brooke’s practical, eyes-on-the-prize approach. She is creative and flexible and doesn’t get mired in nonessential details. Whether the matter involves a professional service agreement, a talent contract or a trademark license, Brooke keeps her clients’ priorities and interests firmly at the forefront.

In the event of disputes, Brooke works closely with the firm’s litigation team to craft compelling arguments or early resolutions that are consistent with her client’s overall goals.

Knowledgeable, reliable, candid, efficient and practical, Brooke makes each client feel seen, heard and well represented. She works extensively in the advertising, entertainment, fashion and beauty, food and restaurant, and gaming industries.

Read more about Brooke Erdos Singer of Davis+Gilbert LLPEmailBrooke's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Louis P. DiLorenzo Louis P. DiLorenzo

Louis DiLorenzo brings an industry perspective to helping clients develop creative, enduring advertising and marketing campaigns. He counsels some of the most innovative and storied brands, agencies, and media companies on issues that may put advertisers and campaigns at risk, including false advertising…

Louis DiLorenzo brings an industry perspective to helping clients develop creative, enduring advertising and marketing campaigns. He counsels some of the most innovative and storied brands, agencies, and media companies on issues that may put advertisers and campaigns at risk, including false advertising, intellectual property, and industry-specific laws and regulations. Read More…

Read more about Louis P. DiLorenzoEmailLouis P.'s Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    ILN IP Insider
  • Organization:
    International Lawyers Network
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo