Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

CFPB Updates: CFPB Report Claims Arbitration “Less Beneficial To Consumers” than Individual or Class Litigation, Foreshadows Attempt to Impose Restrictions in Future

By Leonard A. Bernstein, Deepa Zavatsky & Nicholas Smyth on March 12, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On March 10, Director Richard Cordray of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“Bureau” or “CFPB”) presided over a Field Hearing on Pre-Dispute Arbitration Clauses, discussing what he described as the “key findings” of the Bureau’s long-awaited 700-page Arbitration Report to Congress published earlier that morning. Reed Smith attorney Deepa Zavatsky attended the hearing, where Cordray expressed the CFPB’s view that pre-dispute arbitration is not a “better alternative” to litigation, and he foreshadowed the Bureau’s likely adoption of limitations to such mandatory provisions in consumer contracts.

Click here to read the full issued Client Alert.

Photo of Leonard A. Bernstein Leonard A. Bernstein
Email
Photo of Deepa Zavatsky Deepa Zavatsky
Email
Photo of Nicholas Smyth Nicholas Smyth
Email
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Global Regulatory Enforcement Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Reed Smith LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo