Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

No NORA? No Problem: Federal District Court Strikes Affirmative Defense Based on Absence of NORA Process in CFPB Case

By Ori Lev on May 25, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Earlier this week, a federal district court ruled that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB’s) failure to provide an advance notice of suit to a defendant in an enforcement action was not a valid affirmative defense.  The CFPB’s advance-notice process, known as NORA, is intended “to ensure that potential subjects of enforcement actions have the opportunity to present their positions to the Bureau before an enforcement action is recommended or commenced.”  While the CFPB typically provides enforcement targets with such notice, it sometimes does not, for reasons that are unclear.  The court’s decision stands for the proposition that there is no legal problem with that.  But as a matter of good government, the CFPB should provide such notice except when doing so would undermine the purposes of the litigation.  Read more in Mayer Brown’s Legal Update, available here.

Photo of Ori Lev Ori Lev
Read more about Ori LevEmail
  • Posted in:
    Other
  • Blog:
    Consumer Financial Services Review
  • Organization:
    Mayer Brown
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo