Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Guilty verdicts delivered in one of Canada’s largest ponzi schemes

By Michael Nowina on March 27, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In a previous post, we reported on a then-ongoing Calgary trial involving an alleged $300 million Ponzi scheme affecting as many as 2,000 people, many of them Canadian.  The fraud represents one of the largest Ponzi schemes in Canadian history.  The accused individuals had already been sanctioned by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Alberta Securities Commission.

On Saturday, February 14, 2015, an eleven-member jury found Gary Allen Sorenson (“Sorenson”) and Milowe Brost (“Brost”) guilty as charged.  Each man was found guilty on two counts of fraud and two counts of theft.  Brost was also found guilty on one count of money laundering.

Throughout the course of the trial, Brost’s lawyer argued that the investment structure related to a failed business endeavour, not a criminal fraud.  In closing arguments, both men continued to proclaim their innocence, with Sorenson representing himself.  It is unclear whether Brost or Sorenson will take a different approach to their sentencing hearings.  Crown prosecutors have stated that they intend to seek the maximum sentence of fourteen years each for Brost and Sorenson.

Although sentencing was scheduled to take place in late February of 2015, the hearing has been postponed until June 8, 2015, to allow Sorenson’s new lawyer sufficient time to familiarize himself with the evidence.  As victim impact statements will be presented during the sentencing hearing, the Crown is currently seeking to identify any as-yet-unknown victims who may wish to seek restitution orders against Brost and Sorenson.

We will continue to provide updates as the remainder of the case unfolds.

* The author wishes to thank Jennifer Bernardo for her assistance with this post.

Photo of Michael Nowina Michael Nowina

Michael Nowina’s litigation practice focuses on a broad range of commercial disputes including advising on the recovery from fraudulent investment schemes, mortgage fraud and credit fraud. Michael’s fraud-related and investigations experience includes representing victims of a Canada-wide investment fraud and ultimately securing recovery…

Michael Nowina’s litigation practice focuses on a broad range of commercial disputes including advising on the recovery from fraudulent investment schemes, mortgage fraud and credit fraud. Michael’s fraud-related and investigations experience includes representing victims of a Canada-wide investment fraud and ultimately securing recovery of a majority of the proceeds from the fraud, advising numerous creditors in proceedings commenced to recover fraudulent conveyances and preferential payments in multi-jurisdictional litigation, and representing financial institutions in identity fraud cases and in proceedings to recover funds from fraudulent borrowers. Michael also frequently advises clients on insolvency matters involving fraud.

Read more about Michael NowinaEmailMichael's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    Canadian Fraud Law
  • Organization:
    Baker McKenzie
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo