Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Pennsylvania Issues Guidance in Response to Supreme Court Decision in Wayfair

By Fox Rothschild LLP on January 24, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Pennsylvania Department of Revenue recently issued guidance in response to the Supreme Court opinion in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., 138 S.Ct. 2080 (2018), clarifying when remote sellers are considered to maintain places of business in Pennsylvania and thus, required to collect and remit Pennsylvania sales taxes.  In Wayfair, the Supreme Court overruled previous precedent requiring a business to have a physical presence in a state before the state could require the business to collect its sales taxes.  See Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992).  After Wayfair, economic nexus may be sufficient for a state to require an out-of-state business to collect and remit its sales tax.  The newly issued Pennsylvania guidance provides that any person who made more than $100,000 of gross sales in Pennsylvania in the past 12 months has sufficient economic nexus to be considered to maintain a place of business in Pennsylvania and thus, is required to collect and remit Pennsylvania sales tax.  This rule applies to transactions that occur on or after July 1, 2019.

Remote businesses must carefully determine whether they meet states’ economic nexus definitions and are required to collect and remit sales taxes.

  • Posted in:
    Tax
  • Organization:
    Fox Rothschild LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo