Skip to content
Menu
Network
Sub-Menu
Browse by Subject
Browse by Publisher
Join the Network
Get Started
Subscribe
Support
Contact
Search
Close
Enter Search Terms
Search
McGlinchey Stafford
ID:
1b831433-2619-30fb-68c4
/
Unclaimed
/
Organization:
McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC
Published Works
1,280 articles
California Federal District Court remands consolidated actions: “commencement of action” under CAFA held to be date case is filed in state court, not date of removal to federal court.
CAFA Law Blog ·
September 17, 2005
cite
The “Schoolhouse Rock” case – Missouri Federal District Court holds that the day Congress adopted CAFA was not the effective date – presidential signature was first required for the Act to become effective.
CAFA Law Blog ·
September 17, 2005
cite
Ohio Federal Court declares that state case filed the day before CAFA’s effective date is not covered by the new law because the action was “commenced” before CAFA’s enactment.
CAFA Law Blog ·
September 17, 2005
cite
Rollo and Crowson publish article: “Mapping the New Class Action Frontier – A Primer On The Class Action Fairness Act, and Amended Federal Rule 23.”
CAFA Law Blog ·
September 5, 2005
cite
California federal judge remands class action to state court – aggregate value of case to either side falls short of CAFA’s $5,000,000 threshold.
CAFA Law Blog ·
September 5, 2005
cite
Previous
1
...
253
254
255
256
Next