Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

McGlinchey Stafford

ID: 1b831433-2619-30fb-68c4
/
Unclaimed
/
Organization: McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC
7th Circuit stresses that CAFA does not apply to removed cases originally filed in state court before CAFA’s effective date. The Court also notes that states vary in determining when a case “commences.”
CAFA Law Blog · September 4, 2005
Pritchett -the first case to consider CAFA – an action is “commenced” on the date initially filed in state court, not the date it is removed.
CAFA Law Blog · September 4, 2005
The 10th Circuit – the first circuit to weigh in – considers the issue, and agrees with Pritchett District Court – the date of initial filing is the “date of commencement” under CAFA.
CAFA Law Blog · September 3, 2005
7th Circuit rules that new class definition does not equal “commencement” for CAFA purposes, but hints at other modifications which might.
CAFA Law Blog · September 3, 2005
ABA’s National Institute on Class Actions Fall ’05 Programs Target CAFA
CAFA Law Blog · August 31, 2005
Previous
1...254255256
Next

Claim This Record

Is this your profile? Upgrade to display your full biography, collected works, social connections, practice areas, and more.

Enhance Your Profile

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo