Skip to main content

Company

TCL

15 published works

  1. Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick: P.L.L.C.

    Corning Incorporated Wins Trade Secrets Initial Determination at ITC

    By Kellogg Hansen Todd Figel & Frederick

    August 18, 2026— A Kellogg Hansen team secured a resounding victory on behalf of firm client Corning Incorporated before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The initial determination of an…

  2. Global IP & Technology Law Blog

    The Federal Circuit Expressly Declares that Juries Determine the Standard-Essentiality of Patent Claims

    By Squire Patton Boggs

    In Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. TCL Commun. Tech. Holdings Ltd.,[1] the Federal Circuit definitively answered the question: “Who determines the standard-essentiality of the patent claims at issue—the court,…

  3. PTABWatch

    Raiders of the Lost Art

    By Ryan J. Schermerhorn

    In Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, (“Ericsson”), v TCL Corporation, (“TCL”), 2017-2381, -2385 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 7, 2019), the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s decision that canceled claims in an Ericsson patent…

  4. IP Update

    Can’t Have Layered Architecture Cake and Eat It Too: No Importing Limitations from Specification in § 101 Analysis

    By Thomas DaMario

    Addressing both the availability of appeal in the absence of a Rule 50(b) motion and the appropriateness of importing limitations from the specification in a 35 USC § 101 analysis,…

  5. Flat Fee IP

    Is There a Right to Jury Trial on Unjust Enrichment Damages for Trade Secret Theft

    By Dave Bohrer

    There is a lack of consensus among Federal Circuit judges whether a jury should determine the amount of restitution or unjust enrichment damages. The three judges that decided TAOS v. Renesas (Fed. Cir.…

  6. Essential Patent Blog

    Federal Circuit rules SEP owner entitled to jury trial on royalty for past unlicensed use of SEP (TCL v. Ericsson)

    By David Long

    Today the Federal Circuit vacated Judge Selna's bench trial decision in the much-watched TCL v. Ericsson case, ruling that Ericsson has the right to a jury trial to  determine  compensation…

  7. China Law Insight

    Guangdong High People’s Court Issued a Guideline for Trial of SEP Disputes

    By King & Wood

    作者:倪振华 金杜律师事务所知识产权部 Guangdong High People’s Court recently issued a “Working Guideline of Guangdong High People's Court on the Trial of Standard Essential Patent Dispute Cases (for trial implementation)” (hereinafter referred…

  8. Essential Patent Blog

    Magistrate Judge Fallon recommends dismissing competition claims against SEP holder (Godo Kaisha IP Bridge v. TCL et al)

    By David Long

    Magistrate Judge Fallon recently Recommended Dismissing competition law counterclaims brought by TCT Mobile (TCT) against Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 (IP Bridge) and Panasonic and Judge Bataillon has now Adopted that ruling. …

  9. Essential Patent Blog

    Judge Selna will make minor changes to FRAND ruling (TCL v. Ericsson)

    By David Long

    Today, Judge Selna issued on Order ruling on Ericsson's motion to alter or amend his FRAND ruling. (See our Jan. 3, 2018 post summarizing FRAND royalty ruling).  Under the procedural…

  10. The IP Law Blog

    U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Makes Rare FRAND Royalty Rate Determination

    By Eric Caligiuri

    The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California recently issued its opinion in TCL Communications v. Ericsson (SACV 14-341 JVS(DFMx) and CV 15-2370 JVS (DFMx)) on standard-essential patents…