A Superior Court judge confirmed that municipalities are not obligated to enter into Host Community Agreements (“HCA”) with recreational cannabis retailers. A prospective recreational cannabis retailer sued the City of Salem for refusing to enter
Latest from Anderson & Kreiger LLP - Page 6
Policyholder Veto Power Over Settlement Does Not Conflict with Insurer’s Duty to Settle Under Massachusetts Unfair Insurance Practices Statute.
Image by TeroVesalainen from Pixabay
Insurer Is Still Obligated To Conduct Reasonable Investigation And Make Good Faith Effort To Settle When Liability Is Reasonably Clear.
Many professional liability policies provide that the insurer will not settle without the policyholder’s consent.
Policyholder Veto Power Over Settlement Does Not Conflict with Insurer’s Duty to Settle Under Massachusetts Unfair Insurance Practices Statute.
Image by TeroVesalainen from Pixabay
Insurer Is Still Obligated To Conduct Reasonable Investigation And Make Good Faith Effort To Settle When Liability Is Reasonably Clear.
Many professional liability policies provide that the insurer will not settle without the policyholder’s consent.
Insurers Can No Longer Deny Coverage on the Basis that the Conduct Alleged is Intentional.
A recent Massachusetts federal court decision (Stearns, J.) addresses two vexing coverage questions involving Massachusetts coverage law:
Does a tort plaintiff have standing to argue in favor of coverage before there is a judgment in
Insurers Can No Longer Deny Coverage on the Basis that the Conduct Alleged is Intentional.
A recent Massachusetts federal court decision (Stearns, J.) addresses two vexing coverage questions involving Massachusetts coverage law:
Does a tort plaintiff have standing to argue in favor of coverage before there is a judgment in
Plaintiff’s “Reptile Theory” Closing was Improper
Plaintiff’s “Reptile Theory” Closing was Improper
First Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment that Insurer did not act Unfairly or Violate Chapter 93A in Handling Ice Dam Claim.
Image by Emilian Robert Vicol from Pixabay
A Large Disparity Between Insurer’s Offers And A Reference Award Is Not Sufficient for an Insured to Defeat Insurer’s Summary Judgment Motion.
Homeowners’ insurance claims for water infiltration due to snow and ice
First Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment that Insurer did not act Unfairly or Violate Chapter 93A in Handling Ice Dam Claim.
Image by Emilian Robert Vicol from Pixabay
A Large Disparity Between Insurer’s Offers And A Reference Award Is Not Sufficient for an Insured to Defeat Insurer’s Summary Judgment Motion.
Homeowners’ insurance claims for water infiltration due to snow and ice
