Case also determines when an insurer can stay a suit against the insured when there is a coverage dispute and whether paying the limits into court tolls the insurer’s liability for interest
Commerce Insurance was
Latest from Anderson & Kreiger LLP - Page 7
Developers No Longer Need to Undertake Any Active Construction to Save a Variance from Lapsing.
Image by Malachi Witt from Pixabay
Beginning construction, or even simply breaking ground, is no longer necessary to exercise rights under a use variance. Last week, the Appeals Court clarified what qualifies as an “exercise” of a use variance, finding
Developers No Longer Need to Undertake Any Active Construction to Save a Variance from Lapsing.
Image by Malachi Witt from Pixabay
Beginning construction, or even simply breaking ground, is no longer necessary to exercise rights under a use variance. Last week, the Appeals Court clarified what qualifies as an “exercise” of a use variance, finding
An Insurer had a Duty to Defend a Claim Alleging the Negligent Transfer of the Claimant’s Money to an Email Scammer.
But No Duty To Indemnify Because The Insured Settled The Claim After The Statute Of Limitations Expired.
A Texas federal District Court recently reconsidered its denial of cross-motions for summary judgment on the duty to defend, and ruled that a
An Insurer had a Duty to Defend a Claim Alleging the Negligent Transfer of the Claimant’s Money to an Email Scammer.
But No Duty To Indemnify Because The Insured Settled The Claim After The Statute Of Limitations Expired.
A Texas federal District Court recently reconsidered its denial of cross-motions for summary judgment on the duty to defend, and ruled that a
Professional Liability Insurer has Duty to Defend Counterclaims in Suit Over Law Firm Split, but No Duty to Fund Affirmative Claims, and the Burden to Allocate is on the Insured.
Image by Jo_Johnston from Pixabay
In a blog post last October, I discussed a District of Massachusetts decision denying a motion to dismiss a suit by a law firm against its professional liability insurer alleging wrongful denial of coverage. In
Professional Liability Insurer has Duty to Defend Counterclaims in Suit Over Law Firm Split, but No Duty to Fund Affirmative Claims, and the Burden to Allocate is on the Insured.
Image by Jo_Johnston from Pixabay
In a blog post last October, I discussed a District of Massachusetts decision denying a motion to dismiss a suit by a law firm against its professional liability insurer alleging wrongful denial of coverage. In
NEGPA v. DEP: The SJC Upholds the Commonwealth’s Climate Change Mitigation Program
This article was first published in the Winter 2019 edition of the Boston Bar Journal.
In a unanimous decision last September, the Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) upheld the Commonwealth’s latest climate change regulations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from
NEGPA v. DEP: The SJC Upholds the Commonwealth’s Climate Change Mitigation Program
This article was first published in the Winter 2019 edition of the Boston Bar Journal.
In a unanimous decision last September, the Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) upheld the Commonwealth’s latest climate change regulations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from
AG Clarifies Town’s Authority to Reject Low Bidder as Not “Responsible” Based on Outside Reference
image credit: igorstevanovic
A recent bid protest decision from the Office of the Attorney General’s Bid Protest Unit (AG) provides guidance on the limits of a municipality’s discretion to reject a bid based on negative references obtained from outside of