Image by Free-Photos from Pixabay
Owners and their project representatives need to strictly adhere to the Massachusetts Prompt Payment Act’s requirements or risk losing their right to dispute payments to contractors, according to a new Superior Court decision. In Tocci
In D’Allessandro v. Lennar Hingham Holdings, LLC, SJC-12891, 2020 WL 6438937 (Mass. Nov. 3, 2020), the Supreme Judicial Court held that the statute of repose starts running more quickly for litigants in condominium developments than previously established. All
Image by Vektor Kunst iXimus from Pixabay
The rapid onset of the novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) is impacting every sector of the economy, and posing special challenges for construction projects as Owners and contractors face the prospect of workforce shortages, supply
image credit: igorstevanovic
A recent bid protest decision from the Office of the Attorney General’s Bid Protest Unit (AG) provides guidance on the limits of a municipality’s discretion to reject a bid based on negative references obtained from outside of
image credit: igorstevanovic
A recent bid protest decision from the Office of the Attorney General’s Bid Protest Unit (AG) provides guidance on the limits of a municipality’s discretion to reject a bid based on negative references obtained from outside of
image credit: Trevor King
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court this week handed down a ruling with wide-ranging implications for contractors and owners alike. The case involved a dispute between G4S Technology LLC (“G4S”) and Massachusetts Technology Park Corporation (“MTPC”),
image credit: Trevor King
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court this week handed down a ruling with wide-ranging implications for contractors and owners alike. The case involved a dispute between G4S Technology LLC (“G4S”) and Massachusetts Technology Park Corporation (“MTPC”),
