According to the Eleventh Circuit, a municipalities’ lawsuit alleging lost tax revenue and increased costs for services case proceed against several large lenders. In City of Miami v. Wells Fargo & Co., 2019 WL 1966943 (11th Cir. 2019), Miami
Balch & Bingham LLP
Balch & Bingham LLP is a corporate law firm with more than 230 attorneys across offices in Birmingham and Montgomery, Alabama; Jacksonville, Florida; Atlanta, Georgia; Gulfport and Jackson, Mississippi; and Washington, D.C. We are recognized for our deep experience serving clients in regulated industries, including energy, financial services and healthcare, and our established practices in business, environmental, government relations, labor and employment and litigation.
Latest from Balch & Bingham LLP - Page 10
CFPB Issues FDCPA Proposed Rule: A Detailed Overview
On May 7, 2019, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released a much anticipated proposed rule regarding the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). The proposed rule marks a momentous development for debt collection and the accounts receivable management industry…
FDCPA Plaintiff Lacks Standing to Bring Class Action for Validation Letter
TCPA Insurance Coverage: A Glimmer of Hope?
Eleventh Circuit sua sponte vacates prior Spokeo opinion
The FDCPA’s Un—Or Least—Sophisticated Consumer Still Has a Burden of Proof
And now for something completely different: Lemke v. Escallate, LLC, No. 17-cv-5234 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 19, 2019). Although some case law out of Illinois may make one question whether to collect debts there, this case illustrates that just because a…
Eleventh Circuit: No Express Threat Required
When attempting to collect time-barred debts, law firms often send standard letters which merely omit an express threat to sue. Earlier this month, the Eleventh Circuit held a least sophisticated consumer might view such a letter as an implicit threat…
Eleventh Circuit Rules that Express Threat of Litigation Not Required to Implicate FDCPA
Supreme Court: FDCPA (sometimes) does not apply to nonjudicial foreclosures
In Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus, LLP, the United States Supreme Court unanimously held the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act does not apply to a law firm conducting a nonjudicial foreclosure.
While the law firm prevailed in Obduskey, the Court’s…
Alabama Supreme Court changes course on validity of future-advance mortgages
In September 2018, the Alabama Supreme Court issued an opinion in GHB Constr. and Dev. Co., Inc. v. West Alabama Bank and Trust, No. 1170484, that caused considerable concern for Alabama lenders. The Court held that future-advance mortgages do not…


