The Supreme Court’s (“SC”) recent[1]interpretation of the intent and scope of Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Act” or “Arbitration Act”) has sent ripples through the Indian arbitration landscape. In this landmark verdict, Justices Sanjiv
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Blogs
Blog Authors
Latest from Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
Novation of Contract and Section 11 Of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
The doctrine of severability dictates that the arbitration clause (arbitration agreement) is deemed to be separate or independent from the overarching contract. Therefore, even when a contract’s legality is challenged, the arbitration agreement remains unaffected. However, the novation of a…
Flipping the Script on Reverse Mergers: Analysis of The Latest Amendment to Merger Rules
Introduction
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) on September 9, 2024, amended Rule 25A of the Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016 (effective from September 17, 2024), by introducing sub-rule 5. The amendment is intended to promote seamless mergers…
The Evolving Landscape of Pre-Reference Interest in Indian Arbitration Regime
The recent ruling by the Supreme Court of India in Pam Developments Private Limited v. The State of West Bengal & Anr.[1] has reignited discussions on awarding pre-reference interest in arbitration proceedings. The case had arisen from a dispute…
Can an Arbitral Tribunal’s Mandate be Extended Post Award?
Introduction of Section 29A to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the “Act”), by way of an amendment in 2015, marked a significant event in the arbitration regime in India. It recognised the sluggishness that had crept into arbitration proceedings…
Delhi High Court grants tax-treaty benefits to Tiger Global’s Flipkart exit
The India–Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (“DTAA”), entered into in 1983, has since been the subject matter of contentious litigations. The well-drafted and reasoned ruling of the Delhi High Court (“Delhi HC”), which explains the availability of benefits to a…
Criminal Breach of Trust vs. Cheating: Decoding the Confusion
Introduction
Offences such as cheating and criminal breach of trust are often invoked in Indian criminal law system. It is common practice that when a First Information Report (“FIR”) is registered under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860…
Ambiguities in Regulatory Thresholds for Rectifying Breaches under the Companies Act, 2013
The Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”) stands as a cornerstone of corporate regulation in India. It lays down a comprehensive compliance framework for body corporates as well as their officers to protect the rights and interests of shareholders and investors. In…
Law Governing Arbitration Agreement: Which Way are Indian Courts Headed?
The process and outcome of arbitration is largely governed by the following laws: (a) law governing the contract referring to the substantive law that parties choose to govern the main contract and any disputes arising thereunder; (b) law governing the…
Blacklisting – A Proportionate Sanction or a Corporate Exile?
The Supreme Court on August 7, 2024, in The Blue Dreamz Advertising Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.[1] rendered a significant judgment in assessing the validity of a debarment or a blacklisting order. The court…