Loss Of Domestic Care: An Additional Head20. It is in these circumstances, that we deem it appropriate to direct that when a Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal or the High Court or this Court is concerned with or a case
The concept of bail represents the most significant intersection between criminal procedure and constitutional law. In the Indian legal landscape, this field has undergone a profound transformation with the enactment of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS). This
The concept of bail is perhaps the single most important meeting point of criminal procedure and constitutional law. In India, this intersection has been re‑drawn with the enactment of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), which replaces the Code
We are called upon to decide only whether the Appellant should be permitted to travel to the US for eight weeks. In evaluating this issue, we must have regard to the nature of the allegations, the conduct of the Appellant
The “exigencies of medical treatment to be undergone” by the Respondent no.2 and that “he has appeared before the Magistrate Court on the last 12 occasions” coupled with his undertaking to return to India within 6 (six) months were considered
After hearing learned counsel for the parties, in our opinion, the permission sought by the appellant to travel abroad to join as Cyber Security Architect with a company in Belgium should not be denied, merely on account of pendency of
Thereafter, the Constitution Bench recorded its conclusions in paragraph 224 as under:224. The conclusions reached in this judgment are summarised below:a. Agreements which are not stamped or are inadequately stamped are inadmissible in evidence Under Section 35 of
Further, when the agreement categorically stipulated timelines for the commencement and completion of the construction and the consequences that were to follow thereupon, it was not necessary for the owners to adduce evidence separately in proof of the actual damage
Accordingly, in the context of Section 8, the question of karta-ship ordinarily does not arise merely because the property has come from a paternal ancestor. The heirs succeed as tenants-in-common with definite and separate shares, and the property devolves by
The Supreme Court’s decision in Shephali Chakraborty v. State of West Bengal Decided On: 03.06.2026,Citation: MANU/SC/0611/2026 deserves attention not only for its conclusion under Section 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, but also for its clear conceptual explanation