On Friday, April 28, 2017, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed, in its entirety, John and Michele Clark’s asbestos personal injury action based on the doctrine of judicial estoppel. In short, the Court
Manning Gross + Massenburg LLP
Manning Gross + Massenburg LLP (MG+M) is a law firm that publishes blogs primarily focused on litigation and regulatory issues related to environmental law, toxic torts, and product liability. The firm provides insights on topics such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) litigation, environmental contamination, class action lawsuits, and regulatory developments at state and federal levels. MG+M's content often addresses legal strategies, risk management, and scientific aspects of environmental and toxic tort cases. The firm also covers developments in employment litigation, business litigation, and other specialized practice areas relevant to corporate defendants and complex litigation matters.
Latest from Manning Gross + Massenburg LLP - Page 13
Guantanamo Bay Attorneys Allege Unsafe Carcinogen Exposures at Camp Justice
Ring the Bell – Another Defense Verdict For Fresenius in Dialysis Treatment Bellwether Trial
Veera v. Banana Republic, LLC: How the California Court of Appeals Has Reduced Proposition 64 (2004) to 40% Off its Intended Value
Missouri Supreme Court Extends Daimler and Says No to Forum Shopping
On February 28, 2017, the Missouri Supreme Court joined a growing list of tribunals to apply a strict reading of the United States Supreme Court’s seminal ruling in Daimler AG v. Bauman, 134 S. Ct. 746 (2014). In State…
Recent Appellate Court Ruling Extends the Application of the Common Law Marriage Before Injury Rule to Apply in Florida’s Wrongful Death Claims
WWJG Do? What Will Justice Gorsuch Do, With “All Exposures Contribute” Testimony in Toxic Tort Cases?
Does Increased Regulation of E-Cigarettes Threaten to Make the Vaping Industry Go Up in Smoke?
Recently, the Food and Drug Administration has regulated electronic cigarettes, making it illegal to sell e-cigarettes to anyone under 18. Similarly, California recently enacted legislation requiring a minimum purchase age of 21 for e-cigarettes.
Tobacco critic Stanton Glantz argued…


