Disparate fame: CD Cal on pleading dilution of composite trademarks (KOOL v BLOOM)
Martin Schwimmer Blogs
Latest from Martin Schwimmer
You can’t really use the DJ Act to obtain a trademark license: Sukumar v IOC (Olympic Rings)
@trademarkblog Tweets and ReTweets June 7 ’01 to
The German Federal Supreme Court has held that domain registrars must disconnect domains used by structurally #copyright #infringing websites. Read the analysis by experts at ILN member NORDEMANN: https://t.co/0oALu9yZxj #ILNInsights #Piracy #BrandProtection
— Incopro (@Incopro) June 8, 2021
mcgurr’s “novel theory of fluid trademarks…would give new meaning to federal trademark law with far-reaching consequences,” said judge blumenfeld, who granted the MTD but gave mcgurr the chance to amend his pleading to reference a specific mark.…
Is the photo on the right fair use of the photo on the left? I don’t mean here.
eCommerce business news: June 1 –
Etsy/DePop
Etsy to buy fashion reseller Depop for $1.63 bln in push for younger consumers https://t.co/s1U8wv5x8T pic.twitter.com/MsH6C0588I
— Reuters (@Reuters) June 2, 2021
Coupang:
After a successful IPO in New York, Coupang’s Bom Kim saw his net worth jump by more than sixfold to $6.4 billion, making him the biggest gainer on this year’s list of Korea’s richest https://t.co/FCAceGc45t
— Forbes (@Forbes) June 2, 2021
Mercado Libre:
MercadoLibre on the path to be a one-stop…
@trademarkblog Tweets and Re-Tweets For The Week June 1 – June 6
How Nanotech Can Foil Counterfeiters – IEEE Spectrum https://t.co/RNKTDH2m0m
— The Trademark Blog (@TrademarkBlog) June 6, 2021
A Pro E-Sports Team Is Getting $210 Million to Change Its Name https://t.co/7awvNSo2Mm
— The Trademark Blog (@TrademarkBlog) June 4, 2021
UDRP alleging that gripe site https://t.co/jhq90cl6Nn (COUPANG is a large Korea ecommerce site) is not a “genuine” gripe site, dismissed – as content does in fact contain gripes.https://t.co/f482BYhBNQ#Domains
— The Trademark Blog (@TrademarkBlog) June 4, …
@trademarkblog tweets through May 31, 2021
Weird udrp re https://t.co/7BviQ72vCg. Domain reflects Accela Chem’s TM (Accela Chem). But complainant is Vifor. Panel says ‘if you add Accela Chem as a co-complainant, you’ll likely win.’ But Vifor doesn’t, so it loses. So what was that all about?https://t.co/XLwXvfXLPy
— The Trademark Blog (@TrademarkBlog) May 31, 2021
Close UDRP regarding https://t.co/0eztc6RdBS goes for respondent.https://t.co/z8hnsfLk8w#Domains
— The Trademark Blog (@TrademarkBlog) May 31, 2021
The Secret Psychology of Sneaker Colors https://t.co/0OISmwen6R
—…
Superstar client Lady Ada of Adafruit Teaches Robot to Shop For Baked Goods
Utility Patent means curtains for trade dress claim – Sure Fit v Maytex Mills (SDNY)
Banksy found to act in bad faith – IPKAT
