On August 31, 2026, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) published an interpretive rule concluding that it lacks statutory authority to establish standalone fuel economy standards for engines used in certain commercial medium-duty and heavy-duty (MDHD) on-highway vehicles. The
Sidley Austin LLP
Sidley Austin LLP is a global law firm that publishes detailed legal analysis and commentary primarily focused on corporate governance, securities litigation, regulatory compliance, and related litigation matters. Its blog content often covers court decisions, regulatory developments, and best practices affecting corporate charters, bylaws, and compliance risks. The firm provides insights into jurisdictional issues, whistleblower implications, and evolving regulatory frameworks impacting financial institutions, pharmaceutical pricing, and digital regulations. Sidley Austin's publications serve legal professionals and corporate clients seeking updates and expert perspectives on complex legal and regulatory challenges.
Website:
https://sidley.com
Sidley Austin LLP Blogs
Blog Authors
Latest from Sidley Austin LLP
Court of Chancery Confirms No Price-Maximization Duty on Public Benefit Corporation Directors
In Drakes Landing Associates, L.P. v. Tilden Park Capital Management, L.P. (Del. Ch. July 29, 2026), the Delaware Court of Chancery confronted an issue of first impression: how, if at all, the Revlon enhanced-scrutiny framework applies when the board of…
EPA and the Army Corps Seek Comment on Another WOTUS Alternative for Implementing Sackett v. EPA
On September 4, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (together, the agencies), announced a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) that requests additional public input on rules the…
When AI Changes The Deal: Seven AI-related Considerations for Life Sciences M&A Dealmakers
Sally Wagner Partin, Sharon R. Flanagan, and Torrey Cope consider how AI is reshaping drug development, particularly at the stages of target and compound identification, and set out the implications of those changes for valuation, diligence, risk, milestone design, and…
Strayed from the Path: Dodiya v. Franklin and the Emerging Rules of the DGCL’s Section 144 Safe Harbors
On August 26, 2026, the Court of Chancery issued Dodiya v. Franklin, C.A. No. 2025-0932-LWW (Del. Ch. Aug. 26, 2026), concluding that the “striking breakdown in corporate governance” detailed in the complaint made the “predictable path to safe harbor”…
Eleventh Circuit Rejects Appointments Clause Challenge to Qui Tam Mechanism
In a landmark decision in Zafirov, the Eleventh Circuit yesterday rejected the argument that the FCA’s qui tam mechanism violates the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. Encouraged by concurring and dissenting opinions in which three Supreme Court Justices have recently questioned qui…
Federal Court Strikes Down New York’s Climate Change Superfund Act
On August 31, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York struck down New York’s Climate Change Superfund Act (the Act). As we reported when the Act was signed into law in 2024, the Act established…
DOJ Continues Medicare Advantage Enforcement Focus with $541.5 Million Settlement
On August 26, 2026, the Department of Justice announced a $541.5 million settlement with a Florida-based provider group serving beneficiaries in the retirement community to resolve allegations that the group violated the False Claims Act by submitting invalid diagnosis codes…
Is my product a medical device? EU Court judgment clarifies that the test includes objective function and intended purpose, and provides guidance relevant to software and AI-enabled tools
The recent judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU or the Court) in Case C-427/24, Diagramm Halbach clarifies the key principles for determining whether a product falls within the definition of a medical device and will…
DOJ Announces Second Settlement Resolving FCA Allegations Based on Employment Discrimination
Earlier this week, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a $21.5 million settlement agreement with five Deloitte entities to resolve allegations that they violated the FCA by engaging in conduct DOJ alleges violated Title VII and Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”)…