IPRS logo from here
Last week, I wrote a post on a licensing quagmire covering the recent dispute between IPRS and Hotel Appolo & Tours Private Limited, which dealt with an important question of whether a hotel needs to take
Spicy IP is a publisher focused on intellectual property law, particularly within the Indian context. It provides detailed analyses of patent law cases, regulatory developments, and policy debates affecting pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and technology sectors. The content often covers judicial interpretations of patentability criteria, data exclusivity, trade secrets, and the intersection of IP with public interest and innovation. Spicy IP also features discussions on legal education and career guidance in IP law, highlighting practical aspects of patent prosecution and litigation. The publisher engages with current issues such as digital privacy, regulatory frameworks, and the impact of emerging technologies on IP rights.
Introduction
“With the internet, the question of ‘territorial’ jurisdiction gets complicated largely on account of the fact that the internet is borderless.”
A sentiment raised by Justice Muralidhar in 2010 still rings true in 2026 (has perhaps turned more complicated).…
At first glance, Jyothy Labs v. Dabur looks like a fairly straightforward trademark dispute over the use of “NEEM” on toothpaste packaging. But beneath the favourable factual matrix lies a shakier doctrinal foundation, particularly on essential-feature protection, the descriptive–suggestive divide,…