Applying Kentucky law, a federal district court has held that a subpoena issued to an insured company was not a “Claim” under a D&O policy’s Side B coverage because the subpoena failed to identify an “Individual Insured.” Springstone, Inc. v.
Wiley Rein is a dominant presence in Washington, DC, with more than 240 attorneys and public policy advisors. Our firm has earned international prominence by representing clients in complex, high-stakes regulatory, litigation, and transactional matters. Many of the firm’s attorneys have held high-level positions in the White House, on Capitol Hill, and in federal agencies including the U.S. Department of Defense, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the Federal Communications Commission, the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Federal Election Commission, and the U.S. Department of Justice. Many of our attorneys also have active high-level security clearances that allow them to quickly “read in” to matters when there is a need to access classified materials. The Legal Times has noted that the firm “represents as perfect a merging of public policy and corporate America as exists in Washington.”
Applying Kentucky law, a federal district court has held that a subpoena issued to an insured company was not a “Claim” under a D&O policy’s Side B coverage because the subpoena failed to identify an “Individual Insured.” Springstone, Inc. v.
A Vermont federal court has held that a suit seeking “benefits [the insured] promised but failed to provide” sought amounts that fell within an exception for “restitution” from the definition of “damages” covered under an E&O policy. James River Ins.
The Indiana Court of Appeals, applying Indiana law, has held that two lawsuits filed against the NCAA claiming that it and its member schools engaged in anticompetitive conduct detrimental to student-athletes arose from Related Wrongful Acts. Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n…