Santana v. Studebaker Health Care Ctr., LLC, 120 Cal. App. 5th 1 (2026)
When J. Ascencion Santana was hired by Studebaker Health Care Center, he signed a series of documents, including three that were “arbitration related.” In response to Santana’s
California Employment Law Update, published by Proskauer Rose LLP, focuses on developments in California labor and employment law. The blog covers topics such as arbitration procedures and deadlines, employee rights related to meal and rest breaks, wage and hour issues including prompt payment of accrued vacation, employment discrimination and retaliation claims, class actions, breach of contract disputes involving employee compensation, and litigation strategies including anti-SLAPP motions. It addresses both statutory and case law updates affecting employers and employees in California, providing insights on compliance, enforcement, and litigation outcomes relevant to labor and employment practitioners.
Paknad v. Superior Court, 119 Cal. App. 5th 1256 (2026)
While still employed by Intuitive Surgical, Michelle Paknad alleged sexual harassment, gender discrimination, and unlawful retaliation. In response, the employer retained outside counsel to investigate. During the investigations that followed, the…
In a welcome reminder that eye-popping punitive damage awards still face meaningful judicial scrutiny, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge has struck down an $83 million punitive damages award that was entered against Liberty Mutual in Slagel v. Liberty Mut.
Employers love a good investigation story—prompt response, outside counsel, thorough interviews, the whole compliance greatest-hits album. But the California Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Paknad v. Superior Court is a sharp reminder that if you plan to rely on…