The Court of Appeal upheld the City of Newport Beach’s reliance on an EIR addendum to approve a residential project whose impacts had been evaluated in a 2006 Program EIR for a general plan update. Olen Properties Corp. v. City
California Land Use & Development Law Report
Legal Commentary on Planning and Development
The California Land Use & Development Law Report, published by Perkins Coie LLP, focuses on legal developments and case law related to land use, environmental impact assessments, and development regulations in California. It covers topics such as environmental impact reports (EIRs), compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), local and state land use regulations, zoning exemptions for public institutions, and judicial interpretations of land development statutes. The blog also addresses issues involving public projects, housing developments, water resource contracts, and the intersection of governmental authority with municipal regulations. It provides updates on significant court rulings and legislative changes affecting land use and development law in California.
Latest from California Land Use & Development Law Report - Page 4
Court Upholds Project Description in EIR for UC Berkeley’s Fire Hazard Vegetation Reduction Plan
Preliminary Injunctions in CEQA Cases Require an Evaluation of Harm to the Public Interest in Informed Decision-Making
Ninth Circuit Upholds FAA’s Alternatives Analysis Limited to Airport Project and No Action Alternative But Invalidates EIS For Failure to Aggregate Construction Equipment Noise
New EIR and Senate Bill Mooted CEQA Challenge to Berkeley Enrollment Decisions
Junipero Serra Statue Not Historically Significant
Berkeley Ordinance Banning Natural Gas Infrastructure Preempted by Federal Statute
The Ninth Circuit held that a Berkeley ordinance prohibiting natural gas infrastructure in new buildings was preempted by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (“EPCA”), 42 U.S.C. § 6297(c), which regulates the energy use of natural gas appliances used in…
Neighbor’s Appeal of Planning Commission Decision Did Not Support Anti-SLAPP Motion
The Court of Appeal ruled that the protected speech or petitioning activity on which an anti-SLAPP motion is based must be a target of the suit and not merely an event that triggered claims unrelated to such speech or activity. …
Court Held That Obligation to Further Fair Housing Requires More Than the Absence of Discrimination and That Base Zoning Allowing Lower Densities Violated Housing Element Law Even Though Overlay Zoning Required Minimum Densities
A court addressed the City of Clovis’ repeated failures to accommodate lower-income housing needs. Disagreeing with the Department of Housing and Community Development’s (HCD’s) determination that the City’s Housing Element complied with Housing Element Laws, it held the City failed…


