In this video, E-Discovery Advocacy and Management team leader Karin S. Jenson answers questions raised by clients and colleagues about the December 1 expected changes to the discovery rules of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, their potential practical impact,
Discovery Advocate
News, Developments and Practical Advice on eDiscovery in the trenches of Litigation
Discovery Advocate, published by Baker & Hostetler LLP, focuses on legal issues related to electronic discovery and data preservation in litigation. The blog covers topics such as the challenges of preserving and producing electronically stored information (ESI), including emails, instant messages, and data on personal devices. It discusses court rulings on discovery obligations, sanctions for discovery failures, and regulatory enforcement actions related to record retention and off-channel communications. The blog also addresses best practices for litigation holds, compliance with discovery rules, and the impact of technology on discovery processes in complex legal disputes.
Latest from Discovery Advocate - Page 5
Developing or Enhancing “Bring Your Own Device” Programs – Your First Five Questions . . .
This is the second blog post in Discovery Advocate’s new series, “Your First Five Questions,” in which we identify a question commonly (or sometimes not so commonly) seen in practice followed by the first five questions you might…
Preservation by Backup Tape – Your First Five Questions . . .
This is the inaugural post in Discovery Advocate’s new series, “Your First Five Questions,” in which we identify a question commonly (or sometimes not so commonly) seen in practice followed by the first five questions you might ask and why.…
Preparing for the December 2015 Changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
The package of changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure presents a powerful opportunity to cut litigation discovery costs, risks and burdens – particularly for skilled legal advocates and businesses that are prepared. And, although the changes are not…
James Sherer Discusses Cross-border Bring Your Own Device (“BYOD”) eDiscovery and Data Privacy Issues
Counsel James Sherer, co-leader of BakerHostetler’s Information Governance team, sat down with Kroll Ontrack’s Michele Lange and Eric Robinson for a Legal Talk Network ESI Report on 2015 Trade Shows and Trends in E-Discovery. Sherer discussed trends associated…
Bring Your Own Device (Everywhere): Legal and Practical Considerations for International BYOD Programs
The cross-use of mobile devices for personal and professional purposes, commonly referred to as “Bring Your Own Device” or “BYOD”, is a relatively recent phenomenon that has created a host of legal and practical challenges for organizations of all sizes.…
Karin Scholz Jenson Discusses E-Discovery in Q&A for Recommind Blog Article
Partner Karin Scholz Jenson, national leader of BakerHostetler’s E-Discovery Advocacy and Management team, participated in a question-and-answer session with Senior Discovery Counsel for Recommind, Inc., Philip Favro. Jenson’s responses appeared in a March 17, 2015, blog post on Recommind.com…
Judge Peck’s Latest Decision on Technology Assisted Review (TAR): Our Past Blog Posts Revisited
Many who consider Magistrate Judge Peck’s recent opinion and order in Rio Tinto PLC v. Vale S.A., which he titled “Predictive Coding a.k.a. Computer Assisted Review a.k.a. Technology Assisted Review (TAR) – Da Silva Moore Revisited,” will focus on his…
From Sedona to Georgetown to New York—What’s Fashionable in eDiscovery This Year?
It’s that time of year, when bench, bar, vendors, and clients think big eDiscovery thoughts. They go to The Sedona Conference (which is not in Sedona), Georgetown Law’s Advanced eDiscovery Institute (which is not at Georgetown Law—but close!), and in…
Predictive coding after keyword screening!? Don’t miss the point of Bridgestone Americas
Magistrate Judge Joe B. Brown’s recent order permitting predictive coding in Bridgestone Americas v. International Business Machines Corporation has received a lot of attention because it allowed the use of predictive coding on a population of documents that had already…