Kaiser Gypsum Company Inc. and Hanson Permanente Cement, Inc. (collectively, the “Debtors”), manufacturers of asbestos-containing cement products, filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy on September 30, 2016 (“Petition Date”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Western District
Latest from In Solvency - Page 2
The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same? Survival of Small Businesses Again Dependent on Action From Congress
Right now, a business with less than $7.5 million in debt can file an easier, cheaper, and more efficient bankruptcy than a traditional Chapter 11. That privilege will soon be limited to businesses with less than around $3 million of
Assignments for the Benefit of Creditors – an often-overlooked state law alternative to Chapter 7 bankruptcy
by Magdalena Schardt
For some folks the three letters ABC are a reminder of elementary school and singing a song to learn the alphabet. For others, it is a throw back to the early 70’s when the Jackson Five and
Mediation in Bankruptcy: A Glimpse
If you were a party to a lawsuit or a contested matter in a bankruptcy proceeding, would you be interested in working towards settlement with the assistance of an impartial third party, that is, a mediator, rather than take on
Are Gate-keeper Provisions in Chapter 11 Confirmation Orders a Stopgap for Nonconsensual Third-Party Releases?
As many bankruptcy practitioners are aware, there is a circuit court split with respect to the allowability of non-consensual third-party releases. Notably, in the Purdue Pharma case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that bankruptcy
What level of “reasonable due diligence” is actually required under Section 547(b) and does it really matter?
As bankruptcy attorneys who often defend clients in preference avoidance actions, we were pleased with the 547(b) amendments, effective as of February 20, 2020, requiring a trustee to conduct some level of due diligence into affirmative defenses before commencing a
The Post-Siegel Fallout Continues: The Supreme Court Has Accepted Certiorari to Determine Whether a Refund of Overpayments Made by Chapter 11 Debtors in Accordance with the Unconstitutional Fee Hike Under the United States Trustee Program is an Appropriate Remedy
On Friday September 28, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review the United States Trustee’s appeal from the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeal’s holding that the Office of the United States Trustee should refund overpayments made by chapter 11
In re The Hacienda Company, LLC – Round 2: Bankruptcy Courts May be Available to Non-Operating Cannabis Companies to Liquidate Assets
As discussed in our earlier blog post, In re The Hacienda Company, LLC – a Flicker of Hope for Distressed Cannabis Companies: Bankruptcy May be Available to Liquidate Assets of Non-Operating Cannabis Companies | In Solvency (foxrothschild.com), Judge Neil
Chapter 11 Plan Confirmed in Boxed, Inc.
On August 30, the bankruptcy court for the District of Delaware confirmed Boxed Inc.’s second amended plan of liquidation on a fully consensual basis. The plan is the result of a global settlement among the debtors, the official committee of
LTL Management, LLC Bankruptcy Dismissed (Again)
The LTL Management, LLC (“LTL” or the “Debtor”) bankruptcy saga may be coming to an end for a second time, at least for now.
On January 30, 2023, the Third Circuit issued its opinion reversing the Bankruptcy Court after finding