Rarely do we see a franchise dispute settled, only to generate more litigation. In Pirtek USA, LLC v. James Bradley Lager, et al., 2023 WL 4676067 (Bankr. N.D. Texas, 2023), Bankruptcy Judge Michelle Jerson addressed several important issues regarding contract
In Solvency
Understandable Insights from Fox Rothschild's National Bankruptcy Practice
In Solvency, published by Fox Rothschild LLP, focuses on legal issues surrounding insolvency and bankruptcy, particularly in the healthcare sector. The blog covers topics such as Chapter 11 reorganization plans, third-party releases in bankruptcy cases, and the impact of government healthcare funding cuts on financially distressed providers. It analyzes significant court decisions, including Supreme Court rulings affecting bankruptcy law, and explores how these decisions influence bankruptcy proceedings and creditor rights. The blog also discusses procedural updates in bankruptcy courts, with a focus on jurisdictions like New Jersey, and addresses the financial challenges faced by healthcare institutions amid regulatory and policy changes.
Latest from In Solvency - Page 3
Attorneys Beware: The Risks of Failing to Comply with the “Wet Signature” Requirement for Declarations in Some Jurisdictions – Cabardo v. Patacsil (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2023) – a Case Study
This article was co-authored by Jenna Jacobik, a summer associate based in the firm’s Greenville, SC office.
Judge Frederick E. Clement of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California recently held that affidavits with a computer-generated signature…
Delaware Bankruptcy Court Latest to Determine that Refund of Excess Quarterly US Trustee Fee Payments is Appropriate
The Fox Rothschild In Solvency blog previously covered the Supreme Court’s decision in Siegel v. Fitzgerald, 142 S. Ct. 1770 (2022), in which the 2017 amendment to 28 U.S.C. § 1930(a)(6) increasing quarterly fees payable to the United States Trustee…
How Safe Is Your 363(m) Sale? The Supreme Court’s Invalidation of Statutory Mootness is a Risk to Asset Purchasers Seeking Certainty
On April 19, 2023, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, writing for a unanimous Court in MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC et.al., 598 U.S. ___ 143 S. Ct. 927 (2023), held that Bankruptcy Code section 363(m) is not jurisdictional. …
In re The Hacienda Company, LLC – a Flicker of Hope for Distressed Cannabis Companies: Bankruptcy May be Available to Liquidate Assets of Non-Operating Cannabis Companies
Cannabis clients are often surprised to learn that the bankruptcy courts are unavailable to liquidate or reorganize most cannabis businesses. Indeed, the Office of the United States Trustee (the “UST”) has a mandate from the Department of Justice to move…
Do Liquidating Trusts Have to Pay Quarterly US Trustee Fees?
In a 2021 opinion in In re Paragon Offshore PLC, 629 B.R. 227 (Bankr. D. Del. 2021) (“Paragon Offshore”), Judge Sontchi of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware held that a litigation trust created post-plan confirmation…
New Complex Case Procedures in the Southern District of Texas
Effective January 1, 2023, the procedures for filing complex cases in the Southern District of Texas changed. The courts have made the procedures specific and detailed. Below are some of the highlights of the new rules.
“Complex Case” is now…
Who Can Be A Future Claims Representative In The Third Circuit?
By: Michael L. Temin and Martha B. Chovanes
Introduction
Imerys Talc American, Inc. (“Imerys”) filed bankruptcy in response to crushing liability imposed by mounting asbestos and talc personal injury claims to take advantage of Bankruptcy Code § 524(g) which, among…
Cryptocurrency Deposits Do Not Belong to Account Holders: New York Bankruptcy Holding Severs Customers’ Right and Title to Crypto Assets Deposited in Celsius Network Earn Program Accounts
In a recent decision by Chief Judge Martin Glenn of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York presiding over cryptocurrency Chapter 11 megacase, In re Celsius Network, LLC, et al., Case No. 22-10964 (MG), Judge…
A Step by Step Process To implement a Proper Screen to Prevent Disqualification Which Would Otherwise Result From a Lateral’s Conflicts
The Delaware Rules of Professional Conduct (“RPC”) impute any individual lawyer’s conflict to all lawyers in a firm. If any individual lawyer has a conflict all attorneys in that lawyer’s firm have the same conflict. Such situations can be considered…