Filed: September 20, 2023
Opinion by: J. Rubin
Holding: the Court held that the relationship
between the subsidiary and parent corporation, which included filing consolidated
tax returns, having the same directors elected to both boards, and a trademark
license issued
Filed: February 7, 2023
Opinion by: Friedman, J.
Holding: A dismissed permissive counter-claim cannot be barred by the
doctrine of res judicata when subsequently filed by the former defendant
in a subsequent lawsuit against the former plaintiff.
Facts
Tapestry, Inc. v. Factory Mutual Insurance
Company (Supreme Court of Maryland)
Filed: December
15, 2022
Opinion
by: Chief Justice M. Fader
Holding: The Supreme Court of Maryland held that a retailer’s
all-risk property insurance policy, that
Filed: September 28, 2022Opinion by: J. BeachleyHolding: The court held that a trial court that compels arbitration retains jurisdiction after an arbitrator has entered an award over the case, even if a party voluntarily dismisses the case pending before the
Filed: December 1, 2022Opinion by: J. WattsHolding: The court held that the question of whether an arbitration agreement existed between Respondents and Petitioner factoring companies that purchased certain structured settlement agreements concerning lead paint poisoning was not a question to
Filed: June 10, 2022Opinion by: J. BredarHolding: The court held that the arbitration provision within the employment agreement between Plaintiff James D. Brown and Defendant Brown’s Maryland Motors, Inc. was enforceable as to Plaintiff under Maryland law. Facts: Plaintiff was a
Filed: March 31, 2022Opinion by: J. LeahyHolding: The court held Appellee Heather Kenney’s claims before the Commission on Common Ownership Communities for Montgomery County (“CCOC”) sufficiently alleged that the Board of Appellant Cherington Condominium Association violated the business judgment rule
Filed: June 29, 2022Holding: A Maryland statute that allowed certain beer, wine, and liquor license holders
in a certain area of a legislative
district to
exchange their licenses for other
licenses under certain circumstances and restricted
the hours of operation
Filed: July
29, 2022
Opinion: Michael
W. Reed
Holding:
The trial court erred in finding that there was no
enforceable contract because there was insufficient consideration, as the
appellant might recover under his claim for detrimental reliance depending on
the
GPL Enterprise, LLC v. Certain Underwriters
at Lloyd’s, et al. (Court of
Special Appeals)
Filed: May
24, 2022
Opinion
by: Judge J. Arthur
Holding: The Court of Special Appeals held that a restaurant’s
commercial property insurance policy
