It should come as no surprise that after the end of a relationship, people sometimes do bad things to the former love of their life. Really, it’s a tale as old as time. But what if, as an act of
The NJ Family Legal Blog, published by Fox Rothschild LLP, focuses on family law issues specific to New Jersey. It covers topics such as alimony statutes and their application, domestic violence restraining orders and related counsel fee awards, division and management of 529 college savings plans in divorce, custody disputes including the role and authority of parenting coordinators, and the legal status of common law marriage in New Jersey. The blog analyzes recent appellate decisions and trial court rulings to explain how family law principles are applied in practice, addressing economic dependence, custody jurisdiction, and procedural aspects of family law litigation.
The recent Appellate Division decision of Litton v. Litton presents an extreme case of what happens when a litigant agrees to submit his or her dispute to arbitration in Rabbinical Court, Bais Din, but then decides not to accept…
Thanks to an introduction by my corporate partner, Gabriel Herman, I recently had the pleasure of interviewing a special friend and client of Fox Rothschild, Aleeza Ben Shalom, of the Netflix series Jewish Matchmaking, for the podcast…
While not my usual blogging fare, a recent case dealing with a discrete issue of Jewish law arising in the context of a dog bite case caught my eye because of its potential applicability to all areas of the law,…
I have written a bunch on this blog about the use of parent coordinators. In fact, one of the most read blog posts on this blog, almost 4 years after it was initially published, is titled The Futility of Parent…
My recent blog post, Appellate Division Rules That A Court Cannot Compel Arbitration on Get Issue Absent Agreement, discussed the constraints faced by secular courts in the context of Get refusal. The article identified the significant difficulties faced by…

The Appellate Division, in an opinion approved for publication titled J.D. v. A.M.W., addressed the trial court’s denial of the Plaintiff’s application for a Final Restraining Order (“FRO”) under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act (“PDVA”). In her appeal,…
An oldie but a goodie. This blog post was originally published on April 14, 2014. With Passover approaching next week, it is an opportune time to re-share and allow you, once again, to redefine your exodus.
________________________________________________________________________________________
Passover begins this…
From time to time, we have written regarding pet custody, though there is very little case law on the issue. Historically, pets were treated as chattel (property) and courts did not enter custody and visitation orders for animals. Houseman v.